Existing users, 
 Ircle X - 3.5a6Internet Relay Chat (IRC) client |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
More Information please. - Version: 3.5a6, 5/20/2008 11:50AM PST
ol_pip
So, what exactly has this update been improved on? Vagueness is not a selling point.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- Update repairs bombing bug on Intel Macs
see what I said of Snak 
- Version: 3.5a5, 11/18/2006 02:30AM PST
(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)
lysdexiaMost Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
Ircle 3.5 and Intel Macs - Version: 3.5a5, 10/27/2006 09:49AM PST
bill5011
Ircle is my favorite IRC client on any OS.
However since getting a MacBook Pro, I am unable to use it, as it unexpectedly quits after a short time, often before getting connected to a server.
What is a stable version of Ircle I can use on my Intel Mac?
Bill
However since getting a MacBook Pro, I am unable to use it, as it unexpectedly quits after a short time, often before getting connected to a server.
What is a stable version of Ircle I can use on my Intel Mac?
Bill
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
Coming along nicely. - Version: 3.5a5, 10/2/2006 03:39AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
NaOH
Ircle has been my IRC client of choice for more years than I care to admit.
That isn't to say I haven't tried others. However, I always come back to Ircle for one reason or another.
I would probably be the first to admit that it's not the prettiest interface around, but it is functional and allows me to customise it to suit my needs.
However, I would want to suggest two improvements that Onno could consider for future releases.
Firstly: Develop a plug-in system to extend the feature set.
Scripting is good and well, but being able to only load one script at a time does limit the choice of features that can be added.
As yet, I haven't found any single script that covers all the capabilities that I want. Being able to load multiple plug-ins which add one feature each would get around that.
(Yes, I know I could write my own script, but that would presume that my scripting abilities are up to the job.)
Secondly: Allow for a single-windowed and tabbed GUI.
This doesn't mean that you have to throw away the existing GUI. Simply allow the existing windows to live within another window, and to be chosen by tabs. (While providing users the choice of operating within a tabbed, non-tabbed or mixed GUI.)
Other than that, I am pretty happy with the direction that Ircle is moving. Stability is improving on Intel Macs, and there are some promising feature developments in the pipeline.
Keep up the good work!
That isn't to say I haven't tried others. However, I always come back to Ircle for one reason or another.
I would probably be the first to admit that it's not the prettiest interface around, but it is functional and allows me to customise it to suit my needs.
However, I would want to suggest two improvements that Onno could consider for future releases.
Firstly: Develop a plug-in system to extend the feature set.
Scripting is good and well, but being able to only load one script at a time does limit the choice of features that can be added.
As yet, I haven't found any single script that covers all the capabilities that I want. Being able to load multiple plug-ins which add one feature each would get around that.
(Yes, I know I could write my own script, but that would presume that my scripting abilities are up to the job.)
Secondly: Allow for a single-windowed and tabbed GUI.
This doesn't mean that you have to throw away the existing GUI. Simply allow the existing windows to live within another window, and to be chosen by tabs. (While providing users the choice of operating within a tabbed, non-tabbed or mixed GUI.)
Other than that, I am pretty happy with the direction that Ircle is moving. Stability is improving on Intel Macs, and there are some promising feature developments in the pipeline.
Keep up the good work!
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
People Still Use IRC ? must be some winners there - Version: 3.5a5, 10/2/2006 03:23AM PST
(0 of 6 users found this comment useful)
calvespa
yikes
Comments - Version: 3.5a3, 3/24/2006 06:52PM PST
(1 of 6 users found this comment useful)
Unix_Maximus
This is Beta so why pay for something buggy plus there are so many things available for free that are better. For example: Chatzilla, Conversation, Colloquy,
Opera, XChat Aqua.
I can see asking for donations but expecting someone to pay as shareware is ridiculous and to me takes alot of nerve. Sorry but people work hard for their money and it does not grow on trees.
You have done nothing to prove to me why I should have your program over someone elses? Maybe someone else has money to throw away but I sure do not.
Opera, XChat Aqua.
I can see asking for donations but expecting someone to pay as shareware is ridiculous and to me takes alot of nerve. Sorry but people work hard for their money and it does not grow on trees.
You have done nothing to prove to me why I should have your program over someone elses? Maybe someone else has money to throw away but I sure do not.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
An old faithful favorite. - Version: 3.5a3, 3/23/2006 09:48AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
virtualsaturna
I don't have a lot of spare money.. None really.. But this is one of those applications that was worthwhile to support. I have been using Ircle for at least a decade, I think more, and it has always (except for a few buggy versions along the way) done everything I wanted in an IRC client. I have tried all the others and they just don't cut the mustard as far as I'm concerned. To each their own, but the power, versatility, great support, one-time registration fee (no upgrade fees in all these years), and features make this the only option for me as far as IRC goes. I just love Ircle. The only thing I'd like that it doesn't have is a built-in IdentD client. In these days of OS X missing that, it would be a nice addition to the software.
IRCLE X - Version: 3.5a2, 2/28/2006 11:46PM PST
(1 of 3 users found this comment useful)
MacMinister
Why should one want to buy this client? There are really great ones for free like Chatzilla, Opera, Colloquy, Conversation and XChat Aqua.
I was not impressed by what I saw. Money doesn't grow on tree's either.
There have been many comments on IRCLE. How about someone who owns it writing a decent review? Why should people want to shell out money and buy it?
The big problem is people make comments but never ever express what they mean. Some even talk in circles and make no sense.
I was not impressed by what I saw. Money doesn't grow on tree's either.
There have been many comments on IRCLE. How about someone who owns it writing a decent review? Why should people want to shell out money and buy it?
The big problem is people make comments but never ever express what they mean. Some even talk in circles and make no sense.
Most Recent Replies: View All 2 Replies
German Version? - Version: 3.1.3b1, 8/17/2005 02:00PM PST
RoyPDX
This appears to be the German version. Where is the English version?
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
