Squeak - 3.10portable Smalltalk-80 implementation |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
Crashes under Panther - Version: 3.6, 10/8/2003 01:15AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
sevenup
Crashes after a few mouse clicks under Panther 7B79.
Cool, but pointless 



- Version: 3.5, 10/6/2003 11:30AM PST
(0 of 2 users found this comment useful)
Diordna (Diordna Software)
Yeah, sure, it's a full implementation of the Smalltalk OS, but why do we need one? We've got Objective-C and Cocoa. I'd rather use OS X than an emulated OS on it.
Pretty pointless really. You need the thing to be able to play stuff made with it.
Pretty pointless really. You need the thing to be able to play stuff made with it.
Most Recent Replies: View All 2 Replies
- Cool, but pointless
Object Oriented Programming,… - Version: 3.5, 4/13/2003 12:41PM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
rcfa
and thus Object Oriented Languages are more than just having classes and things called objects. Alan Kay and the people at Xerox PARC I think coined the term OOP, and in any case, he lists a number of properties a language has to have in order to qualify as OOPL. SmallTalk and possibly some of the LISP dialects and extensions are the first ones to qualify on all points. Thus neither C++ nor Simula are OOPLs, even though the latter constitutes a milestone on the way to OOPLs.