Existing users, 
Advanced Search
 Textures - 2.2.0b9implementation of TeX/LaTeX for math typographical settings |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
Not going to bother .... - Version: 2.2.0b6, 1/15/2008 02:05AM PST
(1 of 2 users found this comment useful)
osos10
Back in the “classic OS” days I worked with textures. It was OK (no more than ****), it was expensive - but we didn’t have too many choices. I frequently used my mac as a terminal under neighboring UNIX mainframes to enjoy the wealth of the LaTeX editors. Nowadays, with the wealth of LaTeX options available for macs, some of them actually leaving textures in the dust, I am not going to even bother with the trial version (I do have my old code somewhere).
Please read before posting! - Version: 2.2.0b4, 12/4/2007 12:57PM PST
(2 of 3 users found this comment useful)
scienceman2
1) Speed.
2) Features.
People, please read the already posted comments at minimum, and USE THE SOFTWARE (for this or any package) before posting your reactions. The existence of free alternatives should not be a reason for posting critical comments of this or any item of software you have not yet tried. If you are happy with the alternative packages, it would be pleasant and would increase your karma to go to the pages of those products and post positive comments there, rather than knock software you haven't tried.
Yes, other products have grown quite feature-full in the time since Textures has been developing its OS X - native version. As a regular user of all of these products for many years, I have been awaiting the return of Textures as an OS X - native app. I have my license from years before, and if the new one works out to be as good as the Classic version was, I will be happy to pay for the upgrade to get my favorite TeX production tool back.
Thank you for your attention.
2) Features.
People, please read the already posted comments at minimum, and USE THE SOFTWARE (for this or any package) before posting your reactions. The existence of free alternatives should not be a reason for posting critical comments of this or any item of software you have not yet tried. If you are happy with the alternative packages, it would be pleasant and would increase your karma to go to the pages of those products and post positive comments there, rather than knock software you haven't tried.
Yes, other products have grown quite feature-full in the time since Textures has been developing its OS X - native version. As a regular user of all of these products for many years, I have been awaiting the return of Textures as an OS X - native app. I have my license from years before, and if the new one works out to be as good as the Classic version was, I will be happy to pay for the upgrade to get my favorite TeX production tool back.
Thank you for your attention.
Most Recent Replies: View All 2 Replies
- New VS Classic Textures
$99 & up... You must be joking! - Version: 2.2.0b4, 12/4/2007 10:45AM PST
(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)
ProfAD
Admittedly, in the old days, Textures was the leader. But nowadays, with so many Tex/Latex freewares of excellent quality floating around, why should anyone pay $99 & up... What is the hidden secret? And here comes a second joke. Contrary to the official statement, this version is free only to Texture owners... You download it naively as a Demo, but you are immediately being asked for a serial. In other words, they want us to buy the serial number without actually having a chance to test the application. I may buy it out of curiosity, just to reveal the $99 & up mystery...
