Mail Act-On - 2.0.5Organizes your email via simple keystrokes. |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| Version 2.0.5: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Features: | Support: | |||
| Ease of Use: | Quality / Stability: | Price: | |||
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
Panther and Tiger? - Version: 2.1.5, 11/12/2009 03:20AM PST
Clams McShrew
Panther and Tiger? Somebody is living in the past.
Very useful productivity tool 



- Version: 2.1.1, 9/2/2009 12:03AM PST
dhlovett
This Mail plug-in has increasingly become one of my most valued productivity tools in direct proportion to my email volume. Very helpful in getting my Inbox to Empty.
Unlike a previous reviewer, I do not find Mail Act-On complex, neither to set up, nor especially to use. It is a delight.
In fact, I just experienced a glitch — whether due to 2.1.1 or an Apple update — which rendered MAO unresponsive. This issue has served to highlight how much I love this simple utility. The issue is reported on Indev's website, and I am confident that a fix will be forthcoming soon.
Unlike a previous reviewer, I do not find Mail Act-On complex, neither to set up, nor especially to use. It is a delight.
In fact, I just experienced a glitch — whether due to 2.1.1 or an Apple update — which rendered MAO unresponsive. This issue has served to highlight how much I love this simple utility. The issue is reported on Indev's website, and I am confident that a fix will be forthcoming soon.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- Very useful productivity tool
Overdeveloped and Overpriced 



- Version: 2.0.5, 5/23/2009 01:05PM PST
(0 of 3 users found this comment useful)
Jason Gladstone
Originally a nice simple add-on for email. It did its job well. It was simple to set up. It was free. Five stars in every category.
The developer revamps MAO for Leopard and forgets what made MAO great. Simple, reliable and free becomes complicated, problematic and overpriced.
A better strategy would have been to offer two versions: a simple 10 version (nobody begrudges the developer a reasonable return on his efforts) comparable (in ease of use and options) to the original MAO and this much more complicated, overdeveloped for the masses, version.
Until then, RIP MAO.
The developer revamps MAO for Leopard and forgets what made MAO great. Simple, reliable and free becomes complicated, problematic and overpriced.
A better strategy would have been to offer two versions: a simple 10 version (nobody begrudges the developer a reasonable return on his efforts) comparable (in ease of use and options) to the original MAO and this much more complicated, overdeveloped for the masses, version.
Until then, RIP MAO.