Existing users, 
 TypeStyler - 10.6.57Customize and create stunning special effects with fonts. |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
(4.2)
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
Typestyler v. Art Text - Version: 10.6.50, 1/6/2010 10:45AM PST
(3 of 6 users found this comment useful)
peterpica
Two different programs.... one's a headliner; the other's a headliner PLUS ad/page layout capabilities. To compare them is folly IMHO. Whereas I have both, I use one for Q&D headers and the other for serious design work.
Most Recent Replies: View All 3 Replies
- Typestyler v. Art Text (2 replies)
Decision time - Version: 10.6.47, 11/26/2009 12:28PM PST
(3 of 4 users found this comment useful)
johnlove
Way back when, I gladly purchased Art Text because TypeStyler disappeared for OS X.
The following thought remains after a year plus, namely, Art Text is relatively more complicated to use, much more. If I remember TypeStyler, every window had a space towards the bottom to type the text .. then selected the appropriate style from the Menu .. CMD-C or CMD-Shift-4 to get the image to the Clipboard .. in business .. quick and easy. The hard part was to choose the specific style, but that was my problem.
I just revisited Art Text update to 2.2, even though what I own, 1.2.4, seems (?) to work for 10.6, I guess.
I say "I guess" because I do not remember how to input the text .. all the talk about a Text Panel .. truth is, I can't seem to find it.
Dunno .. a text style generator just should not be this complicated.
I'd jump in a heartbeat to TypeStyler, but come on, $100, not to mention their repeated assertions to the effect "OS X any minute now!" I just remember this evasion.
So I am in a quandry, to choose between (IMHO) a overpriced TypeStyler and a relatively complicated Art Text.
Thanks for listening.
John Love
The following thought remains after a year plus, namely, Art Text is relatively more complicated to use, much more. If I remember TypeStyler, every window had a space towards the bottom to type the text .. then selected the appropriate style from the Menu .. CMD-C or CMD-Shift-4 to get the image to the Clipboard .. in business .. quick and easy. The hard part was to choose the specific style, but that was my problem.
I just revisited Art Text update to 2.2, even though what I own, 1.2.4, seems (?) to work for 10.6, I guess.
I say "I guess" because I do not remember how to input the text .. all the talk about a Text Panel .. truth is, I can't seem to find it.
Dunno .. a text style generator just should not be this complicated.
I'd jump in a heartbeat to TypeStyler, but come on, $100, not to mention their repeated assertions to the effect "OS X any minute now!" I just remember this evasion.
So I am in a quandry, to choose between (IMHO) a overpriced TypeStyler and a relatively complicated Art Text.
Thanks for listening.
John Love
Most Recent Replies: View All 3 Replies
- Decision time ... Art Text 2 (1 replies)
Old days - Version: 10.6.42, 11/20/2009 07:20AM PST
(4 of 6 users found this comment useful)
develand
I remember this. Used to use it a lot. Back in the day when you had to buy ATM, TypeReunion and SAM for your Macs. Talk about a one-trick Pony, but for some needs (especially silk-screening) this was the BEST.
