Existing users, 
 Apple WebObjects Developer - 5.4.3web app development |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
WO's future? - Version: 5.3.1, 8/14/2006 05:02PM PST
libertyforall1776
Most Recent Replies: View All 2 Replies
- So long Java... (1 replies)
WO Is Free Now for Development!!! 
- Version: 5.3, 6/23/2005 03:43PM PST
(6 of 6 users found this comment useful)
ylon
I hope that you all realize that WebObjects is now free for development! This is tremendous and is ready to take the web application development world by storm!
Of course deployment is not free, but server deployment it is looking very attractive as you can simply buy your Mac OS X Server 10 client license package and then install this on other server platforms since the license is not bound to server platform anymore with the 5.3 release! Interesting times indeed!
Of course deployment is not free, but server deployment it is looking very attractive as you can simply buy your Mac OS X Server 10 client license package and then install this on other server platforms since the license is not bound to server platform anymore with the 5.3 release! Interesting times indeed!
Amazing... - Version: 5.2.4, 5/4/2005 12:12PM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
capmilk
I would never have hoped that Apple releases a WO patch for 10.4 without forcing everyone to buy a new license - amazing! Thanks, guys.
Hoping - Version: 5.2.3, 3/18/2004 06:09AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
old_mac
that Apple will release Web Objects to open source if Sun and IBM do an open source version of Java.
There are just too many other alternatives to WebObjects, many of them free. I realize it cost $50,000 a few years ago and $700 is more than reasonable, but it is still out of reach for the small guys.
There are just too many other alternatives to WebObjects, many of them free. I realize it cost $50,000 a few years ago and $700 is more than reasonable, but it is still out of reach for the small guys.
the eval serial… 
- Version: 5.2, 11/14/2002 08:26AM PST
eleon
works fine. the 5.1 serial allows installing but not launching builds. :/ 700$ is a lot for a 5.1 owner
According to e-mail… - Version: 5.2, 11/13/2002 03:18PM PST
(1 of 6 users found this comment useful)
dpgrizzle
announcement, there is no upgrade to 5.2. Since I just bought WebObjects 5.1 a couple of weeks ago, it feels like I burned $700. I wonder -- the WebObjects deployment license on the $6,500 Xserve I bought at the same time, will it require a $700 "upgrade", too? How is it possible to be a happy Apple customer?
Saw them demo… - Version: 5.2, 11/13/2002 07:37AM PST
shmert2
the web services stuff at WWDC. It looks really nicely done. Basically a way to map your directAction methods and parameters to SOAP requests. Generates all the icky stuff for you. Numerous bugs I hope they've fixed. If they have, I'll definitely come back and give it 5.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
The best application… - Version: 5.2, 11/13/2002 01:21AM PST
Skrak
server just got better! There should be an upgrade price though.
Come on Apple,… - Version: 5.2, 11/12/2002 01:05PM PST
cplater
another point release that is only available at full price? Where is the upgrade pricing?
Deprecation Notice
NOTE: As of the release of Xcode 2.4, the Cocoa Java bridge has been deprecated. This means that,
while still supported with Xcode 2.4, future releases of Xcode may not support the bridge or other
dependent features. Due to this, the following additional WebObjects developer applications are also
being deprecated:
EOModeler
EOModeler Plugin
WebObjects Builder
WebServices Assistant
RuleEditor
WOALauncher
This also means that the Xcode Java bridge templates have been deprecated, and should not be used
for new Java bridge-based development.