GLUON TableMaker - 6.10tool to create tables from tabbed text in Quark |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
I agree with… 



- Version: 5.62, 3/27/2002 01:54PM PST
JAG2
GLUON. As a 12-year XPress (Mac) user, I see so many innovative XTensions that Quark should implement into the program. I agree that third-party XTension developers not only have good ideas that Quark's own stafff does not, but have the programmer's skills to create them. If you have used XPress 5.0's table features, you will know that they are good but nothing to write home about. Now, if they could fix that OPI and non-printing PDF problem....
Let me assure… - Version: 5.61, 1/14/2002 02:16PM PST
FirstSource
everyone GLUON isn't "raking in the cash" on any of our products. People make a lot more money using our products than we do selling them! I'd like to put in a plug for us developers who aren't Quark and aren't Adobe. We have good ideas too and we think of stuff neither of them have. In fact, Tablemaker takes a unique approach to tables which will allow us to do things in the future which will make "word processor" tables look pretty lame (as they do now). This is a designer's world...things evolve...so stay tuned in.
This is something… - Version: 5.61, 1/14/2002 12:58PM PST
s. stevens
that should be standard in Quark, but as usual, they leave it up to third party vendors to make the software and rake in the cash. If you added up all the money you would have to spend on third party extensions to do what inDesign 1.5 does now, it would be well over $1500. Quark has a very cozy relationship with its Xtension vendors by not providing functions that you can get in a word processor.