ImageJ - 1.42fScriptable scientific image processing. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| Version 1.42f: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Features: | Support: | |||
| Ease of Use: | Quality / Stability: | Price: | |||
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
64 bit no longer works after Java update - Version: 1.43a, 6/19/2009 04:35PM PST
(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)
MacJuanC
After the latest Java update from Apple (JavaForMacOSX10.5Update4), the 64 bit version of ImageJ no longer starts. Double click on the icon, and you get nothing. The 32 bit version works ok.
ImageJ is great 



- Version: 1.42f, 1/9/2009 05:04PM PST
(3 of 3 users found this comment useful)
wraggj
We have been using it for years at my University. Keeping in mind the price, and the collaborative method used to develop it, I think it is an awesome product. It is very versatile, and we use if for electron microscopy, astronomical images, and everything in between. It is mostly designed for medical/biology uses though.
extremely painful to use 



- Version: 1.42d, 12/12/2008 12:07AM PST
(2 of 6 users found this comment useful)
michael_zollner
Hideously designed and extremely painful to use. Plugins are poorly documented too. How do I know that algorithms in them are implemented correctly and their calculations are reliable? There is no any documentation to prove that.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- extremely painful to use