Glims - 1.0b23Adds features to Safari: improved search, thumbnails in search results... |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
Sweet addon 



- Version: 1.0b22, 10/24/2009 06:31AM PST
philosopherdog
FEATURE REQUEST - Version: 1.0b22, 10/21/2009 10:34AM PST
crunchie--2008
Glims vs. Saft - Version: 1.0b21, 9/30/2009 12:48AM PST
(5 of 5 users found this comment useful)
WhiteDogAnother casualty of the changed environment in Snow Leopard is Pith Helmet, which I have used for a long time and found to be a most effective ad blocker. In it's place there is Glimmer Blocker, which does not hack Safari in order to block ads and hence does not suffer every time Safari changes. Also useful - and upgraded for OS X 10.6 - is ClickToFlash, which provides invaluable control over those annoying flash ads that clutter so many web sites now.
In sum, I use Glims because it doesn't break every time Apple updates Safari, which they seem to do on a monthly basis these days. Also, Glims has surpassed Saft in tab and window control, and I like some of the unique features it offers. That's not to say that Saft is defective in any way, and the author has found a way around the limitations Snow Leopard imposed on its previous method of operation. But I prefer Glims now - and it is freeware.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- Glims vs. Saft
Latest version? Site say b20, but dmg says b21 - Version: 1.0b20, 9/28/2009 05:26PM PST
(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)
CowicideMost Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
Should Saft-users switch to Glims? - Version: 1.0b20, 9/18/2009 03:30AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
versiontracker367could force a mostly satisfied SAFT-user,
working with Leopard and Snow Leoprad
to switch to Glims?
What is missing, that Saft has and Glims does not?
Any thoughts or recommendations?
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
Snow Leopard (interim) Tip - Version: 1.0b20, 9/2/2009 10:26AM PST
(3 of 3 users found this comment useful)
thmghtdMost Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
Broken under Snow Leopard... - Version: 1.0b20, 8/31/2009 10:01PM PST
dsorel
Does not work with Safari 4.0.3 - Version: 1.0 beta 19, 8/13/2009 12:07PM PST
kernos
Most Recent Replies: View All 2 Replies
Great potential, still a lot of bugs! 



- Version: 1.0 beta 19, 7/24/2009 03:56AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
vanrey
Suddenly there's a need for a new Glims security setting - Version: 1.0 beta 15, 5/8/2009 08:33AM PST
Kudrabar
Is anyone else experiencing this behavior, and did it start suddenly a week or two ago for you as it did for me?
This seems like just the kind of behavior Glims could stop by introducing a security tab that includes preferences to "Never allow a site to change the size of my browser window," and "Never allow a site to hide or show toolbars." If necessary, perhaps you could bundle those and other security settings together as behaviors that are prohibited for most websites but allowed for certain "trusted" sites that must be included in a special list through an app selection dialog.
This is the perfect opportunity for Glims to break into the provision of additional security, which ALL versions of Safari need more of. It's got to be the only major browser that offers next to NO security preferences!
SPECS: Late 2008 Unibody Aluminum 2.4 GHz Core2Duo MacBook with 4 GB of RAM running 10.5.6.
Most Recent Replies: View All 2 Replies