Things - 1.1.3Personal task management. |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
Beautiful app 



- Version: 1.1.1, 5/10/2009 10:46AM PST
(5 of 6 users found this comment useful)
roostery
This is one of the most satisfying apps I've ever used, after many unsatisfactory experiences with To Do List and, in particular, GTD applications.
A trivial example representative of bigger picture: The first time I used Things, I was struck by its treatment of columns... or rather its use of flexible columns. Applications generally take the view that a column should always be a column, whether or not a particular row contains data. If, for instance, you have a column containing tags, the column is present (and of fixed width) whether a particular item has zero tags or ten. With Things, an item's tag column expands if it has more tags, and it's invisible if it has no tags. Sound like trouble? It really isn't. In fact, it's beautiful. Try it and see.
The bigger picture that this trivial example illustrates is that the developers of this app have really considered the user experience, right down to questioning why things need to be done the way they've "always been done." They've created a gorgeous, streamlined app that really (finally!) helps me work through my list of tasks. Complaints? I have only one: I wish that there were slightly more visual feedback when clicking a checkbox.
It's a pleasure to synch Things with the iPhone version. I know that some have expressed difficulty: I've never had a synch problem. Beyond that, the pace of development is steady, and fresh iterations tend towards the "useful enhancement" rather than the "window dressing" end of the spectrum.
I should say that I also own the desktop and iPhone versions of OmniFocus, which is another fine application. If Things didn't exist, I'd probably be firing up OmniFocus, but I'd wince just a little every time. It isn't as pretty, nor as intuitive as Things, and in an effort to provide flexibility for list tweakers, it sacrifices a measure of elegance. Let me be clear: OmniFocus does not suck. I just think that Things makes it easier and more pleasant to get things done.
A trivial example representative of bigger picture: The first time I used Things, I was struck by its treatment of columns... or rather its use of flexible columns. Applications generally take the view that a column should always be a column, whether or not a particular row contains data. If, for instance, you have a column containing tags, the column is present (and of fixed width) whether a particular item has zero tags or ten. With Things, an item's tag column expands if it has more tags, and it's invisible if it has no tags. Sound like trouble? It really isn't. In fact, it's beautiful. Try it and see.
The bigger picture that this trivial example illustrates is that the developers of this app have really considered the user experience, right down to questioning why things need to be done the way they've "always been done." They've created a gorgeous, streamlined app that really (finally!) helps me work through my list of tasks. Complaints? I have only one: I wish that there were slightly more visual feedback when clicking a checkbox.
It's a pleasure to synch Things with the iPhone version. I know that some have expressed difficulty: I've never had a synch problem. Beyond that, the pace of development is steady, and fresh iterations tend towards the "useful enhancement" rather than the "window dressing" end of the spectrum.
I should say that I also own the desktop and iPhone versions of OmniFocus, which is another fine application. If Things didn't exist, I'd probably be firing up OmniFocus, but I'd wince just a little every time. It isn't as pretty, nor as intuitive as Things, and in an effort to provide flexibility for list tweakers, it sacrifices a measure of elegance. Let me be clear: OmniFocus does not suck. I just think that Things makes it easier and more pleasant to get things done.
Development extremely slow 



- Version: 1.1.1, 5/10/2009 08:02AM PST
(3 of 7 users found this comment useful)
bonobo42
The app has great potential, unfortunately the development is very slow and the developers don't seem to care about what the users want - several longstanding bugs are still not squashed, even if the developers gave them "high priority" more than half a year ago.
Recently the atmosphere in the company's user forums had deteriorated massively, with many people complaining about the lack of responsiveness from the developers. Instead of replying to their users, the company decided to take down the link to the user forums from their homepage. So much for customer support.
I used the app for a long time from the early betas, since I am heavily invested in it it is not easy to find a replacement, but at the moment I would not recommend the app to any new user.
Recently the atmosphere in the company's user forums had deteriorated massively, with many people complaining about the lack of responsiveness from the developers. Instead of replying to their users, the company decided to take down the link to the user forums from their homepage. So much for customer support.
I used the app for a long time from the early betas, since I am heavily invested in it it is not easy to find a replacement, but at the moment I would not recommend the app to any new user.
There are a couple of things I would like to see added, and I've sent my request to the developer.
Things helps me organize and get the work done. It works!