Existing users, 
 LiteIcon - 1.3.1quickly change/restore system icons |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
All Feedback: 1 - 8 of 8
Outstanding 
- Version: 1.3.1, 3/2/2008 12:35PM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
Kuromi
Smarter than CandyBar and ...can't beat the price!
what the heck - Version: 1.3.1, 2/17/2008 12:00AM PST
(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)
lex_world
downloads fine then nothing. it will not launch!
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- what the heck
For icons go to ... - Version: 1.3 Beta, 2/5/2008 12:00AM PST
(0 of 2 users found this comment useful)
roro01
Folders - Full Set which is a complete new set of folder icons to replace all the default blue Apple folder icons on your Mac.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
Doesn't launch in 10.5 - Version: 1.2.2, 10/30/2007 06:27PM PST
(1 of 2 users found this comment useful)
wondrack_dotmac
FYI.
Great product, hope to see an upgrade to work with 10.5.
Great product, hope to see an upgrade to work with 10.5.
Very nice - Version: 1.2.2, 5/11/2007 06:45PM PST
(1 of 2 users found this comment useful)
gudrick
This works as advertised, is beautifully executed, and is free to boot. No drawbacks as far as I can tell. Cheers to the developer!
I have no clue as to why there are not more glowing reviews for this great and very useful piece of software; it definitely serves a niche.
I have no clue as to why there are not more glowing reviews for this great and very useful piece of software; it definitely serves a niche.
No reviews? Well, why didn't you write the first? - Version: 1.2.2, 5/5/2007 08:24PM PST
(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)
mightydog_dotmac
I have to agree with AppleGeek. My question, gudrick, is why would you take the time to make such a comment?
People on this site are more apt to warn their Mac-using friends of bad applications than they are to come back and state an application works as described. I rarely comment on something unless it surpasses my expectations, especially if the developer is giving it away.
But if I try out something that crashes, I will usually test it on another Mac first, especially if there were no comments about crashing. If I get consistant crashes, I'll contact the developer before coming here to report it. There are too many pure Mac amateurs who will blast an app knowing almost nothing about permissions, UNIX housekeeping, etc.
I consulted with Fortune 500 companies for too many years to feel like I could judge something in a five-minute test. To me, "no reviews" most likely means no one has found anything terribly wrong with it.
But in any event, all software I try gets tested on a sandbox. Even if it takes everything down, I only lost a little time.
I have a licensed copy of CandyBar, so I'll be able to give this a good review. CandyBar isn't perfect, just like every other piece of software available. But generally, it works fine. The developer of CandyBar will be the one to hate this app the most.
People on this site are more apt to warn their Mac-using friends of bad applications than they are to come back and state an application works as described. I rarely comment on something unless it surpasses my expectations, especially if the developer is giving it away.
But if I try out something that crashes, I will usually test it on another Mac first, especially if there were no comments about crashing. If I get consistant crashes, I'll contact the developer before coming here to report it. There are too many pure Mac amateurs who will blast an app knowing almost nothing about permissions, UNIX housekeeping, etc.
I consulted with Fortune 500 companies for too many years to feel like I could judge something in a five-minute test. To me, "no reviews" most likely means no one has found anything terribly wrong with it.
But in any event, all software I try gets tested on a sandbox. Even if it takes everything down, I only lost a little time.
I have a licensed copy of CandyBar, so I'll be able to give this a good review. CandyBar isn't perfect, just like every other piece of software available. But generally, it works fine. The developer of CandyBar will be the one to hate this app the most.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
works great! - Version: 1.2.2, 5/5/2007 12:32PM PST
(1 of 2 users found this comment useful)
djc0
I really like this program. Easy to use and functional. Does exaclty what it says.
I would encourage the author to continue to develop it by expanding the icons that can be changed.
I would encourage the author to continue to develop it by expanding the icons that can be changed.
No reviews? - Version: 1.2.1, 5/4/2007 06:53PM PST
(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)
gudrick
Over 800 downloads and not a single review? That makes me nervous!
Most Recent Replies: View All 2 Replies
- No reviews? (1 replies)
