Jungle Disk - 3.0b1Unlimited online storage & backup via Amazon S3. |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
All Feedback: 1 - 9 of 9
What's not to love? Powered by RackSpace! 



- Version: 2.61, 8/6/2009 06:35PM PST
(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)
RAlfieri
Why are you charging for a beta? - Version: 2.61, 4/28/2009 02:52PM PST
(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)
summerstormpicturesMost Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- Why are you charging for a beta?
Addendum to "Offsite storage is best." - Version: 2.60a, 3/14/2009 01:26AM PST
(0 of 2 users found this comment useful)
EvanitudeEvan MItchell Stark PhD
me at evanmitchellstark dot me
Professional offsite storage is best. - Version: 2.60a, 3/14/2009 01:18AM PST
Evanitude
Having two tbyte drives in different places seems like a decent alternative. That said, it's not infallible compared to multiple redundancies in multiple safe storage sites. Why? I've been using Mac's since the first one rolled out and mass storage was a 20 megabyte scsi drive the size and heft of the American Heritage Dictionary. Since owning generations of different drives made by different manufacturers, I've found that they fail more often than the average rate of 15% within three years. Even worse, at least twice in my life, flood and fire have destroyed my equipment. If it weren't for offsite storage of my most precious photos and files, I'd be offsite in some safe room--in a straight jacket.
So to the good soul who asked why not use Apple free solutions, I do use them. And I use Jungle disk for the above reasons.
Cheers.
Evan Mitchell Stark Phd
Great off site backup! 



- Version: 2.01a, 6/27/2008 10:30PM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
camnerVersion 2 is a nice update. It looks much more "mac like," and the new organization is easier and more intuitive.
I don't use JD to backup EVERYTHING I have, because that would get a bit pricey, but for nice peace of mind for essential files, JD is hard to beat.
Leopard's built in Time Machine does the same thing - Version: 2.0 beta 4, 5/31/2008 04:28AM PST
(0 of 4 users found this comment useful)
cinthiamacMost Recent Replies: View All 7 Replies
great backup solution 



- Version: 1.43a, 10/7/2007 09:16PM PST
(3 of 3 users found this comment useful)
Andy01
Finally! 



- Version: 1.41a, 8/9/2007 11:41AM PST
(4 of 4 users found this comment useful)
MachoMan XMost Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
If you use the RackSpace cloud instead of Amazon S3, you do not have to pay transfer or bandwidth charges. Just storage. That's it!
Try it. I think you'll like it. No other vendor out there offers so much for so little.