Existing users, 
 Apple Digital Camera RAW Support - updatefor OS X 10.4 Intel macs |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
(4.2)
Feedback Summary:
| Version update: | |||||
| Overall Rating: |  (5.0) |
Features: | (5.0) |
Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | (5.0) |
Quality / Stability: | (5.0) |
Price: | (5.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
Will Apple ever provide RAW support for the Panasonic LX3? - Version: 2.6, 6/4/2009 02:29PM PST
(1 of 2 users found this comment useful)
jhersco
Still no support for the Panasonic LX3. If you own this camera, please send feedback to Apple at http://www.apple.com/feedback/macosx.html and request RAW support. Apple needs to know that there are more than just a few of us out there that want to use Aperture and/or iPhoto with this camera's RAW formatted photos.
Most Recent Replies: View All 2 Replies
- Will Apple ever provide RAW support for the Panasonic LX3?
Adobe DNG Converter - Version: 2.5, 3/3/2009 07:05AM PST
dpgrizzle
If your camera RAW format is not supported by Aperture, the solution is <b>Adobe DNG Converter</b>, a free utility available at the Adobe website.
DNG Converter with batch convert a huge variety of camera RAW formats into DNG, the Adobe "digital negative." Purists will appreciate the fact that the source RAW file can be embedded into the DNG. I have been very pleased working with the resulting DNG files, which are extremely wide gamut. If absolute control is ever required, I can extract my original camera RAW from the DNG stored in Aperture.
Another advantage - DNG is probably the best archival format choice, thanks to an open specification backed by Adobe. Even if I were opposed to any intermediate processing of camera RAW, I would still convert all my images because I believe DNG will be around and supported long after a specific camera RAW format is dead, gone, and forgotten.
DNG Converter with batch convert a huge variety of camera RAW formats into DNG, the Adobe "digital negative." Purists will appreciate the fact that the source RAW file can be embedded into the DNG. I have been very pleased working with the resulting DNG files, which are extremely wide gamut. If absolute control is ever required, I can extract my original camera RAW from the DNG stored in Aperture.
Another advantage - DNG is probably the best archival format choice, thanks to an open specification backed by Adobe. Even if I were opposed to any intermediate processing of camera RAW, I would still convert all my images because I believe DNG will be around and supported long after a specific camera RAW format is dead, gone, and forgotten.
Boring. - Version: 2.5, 3/2/2009 05:44PM PST
(1 of 5 users found this comment useful)
versiontracker2007
Instead of the endless complains about Apple ("wai duz u not supportz mai cameraz?"), how about contacting the camera makers and yell at them? THEY are to blame for the current situation, not Apple, as they refuse to standardize the RAW format and frequently deliberately do their own thing to deviate from everyone else, including trying to lock everyone else out by encrypting the data.
If the camera makers stop jerking us around, then this problem would go away.
If the camera makers stop jerking us around, then this problem would go away.
Most Recent Replies: View All 2 Replies
