Man Viewer - 3.1.1View OS X man pages. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
3.0 No Go In Tiger - Version: 3.0, 4/24/2008 03:15PM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
zunipusMost Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- Where to get v2.0.0
Geek? - Version: 2.0, 2/14/2007 12:57PM PST
(4 of 5 users found this comment useful)
WhiteDog
Ancient_Boii_Tribe, heaven forefend you should learn something checking out new software on Version Tracker. The description on the Version Tracker main page usually clues me it to whether I would be interested in looking at a listed item in more detail. It's not like there is a clearly defined line between geeks and non-geeks that could be reliably used to segregate software. In any case, it's not Version Tracker or the software developers' job to decide which you are. Only you can make that determination - and only you can decide what does and does not interest you.
Reason for download - Version: 1.0, 10/13/2006 12:10PM PST
halprin
I decided against using the offline man pages as I wanted to include all the standard pages that also comes with Mac OS X Server. So if you only had the client (most of us), you wouldn't be able to see the Mac OS X Server man pages.
As for the downloading/parsing stalling, that isn't sopose to happen.
Either way, I am open for opinions. Would you guys want the next version to just read your offline man pages?
As for the downloading/parsing stalling, that isn't sopose to happen.
Either way, I am open for opinions. Would you guys want the next version to just read your offline man pages?
Most Recent Replies: View All 2 Replies
The previous version works fine in Tiger.