CD Stack - 1.1.2high volume cd ripping & mp3 encoding using LAME |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
Good Product Overall 



- Version: 1.0.2, 6/18/2006 08:39PM PST
dave170
I was looking for a product to handle some encoding I do on a regular basis and to replace a free ripper I was using. I have a one hour long church service that needs to be converted from cd to mp3 for use on our website. Most mp3 rippers do use the L.A.M.E engine but non of them seperate the encoding and writing process like this does. The real selling point here is time. It takes 3-5 minutes to enclode the entire 1 hour long service then the writing is done in the background so I can put in another cd to rip. At first I must say I thought $14.95 for a bit high for a product that several free applications can do. However the time it saves me is well worth the money. I also have to say the support for the product is very good. At first CD Stack created a couple of files that did not work. I wrote to the authors and they responded quickly and eger to help. I was not able to get CD Stack to reproduce the problem however it's been a few months and it still hasn't happened again. I upgraded to v1.0.2 today without any trouble everything is working great.
Not sure what this means... - Version: 1.0.2, 6/1/2006 11:34AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
ghobish
Developer says, <i>unlike other software that uses L.A.M.E. for the Mac, CD Stack does not require you to use iTunes. It completely stands alone.</i>
Don't know what they mean by that. I'm an audio pro, use at least 5 different audio products that use the L.A.M.E. engine for MP3 encoding, and not one of the "requires" you to use iTunes.
Except, of course, iTunes.
(No rating untilI try it...)
Don't know what they mean by that. I'm an audio pro, use at least 5 different audio products that use the L.A.M.E. engine for MP3 encoding, and not one of the "requires" you to use iTunes.
Except, of course, iTunes.
(No rating untilI try it...)
AAC? - Version: 1.0, 5/27/2006 11:12AM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
deasys
This utility is a great idea. I'll wait until you add AAC and Apple Lossless encoding capability before trying it out.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- AAC?