Existing users, 
Advanced Search
 iTunify - 1.7.8additional, integrated tools for iTunes |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
dead link to Doug - Version: 1.7.7, 1/21/2008 12:00AM PST
Mikis
On the Satsumac web page there a erroneus link saying "Some of the code used in iTunify is available as a free download from Doug's AppleScripts for iTunes". The link however is faulty and leads to an error page.
While he's being semi-open about it I question the morale to package free scripts and charge for it without the explicit consent of the developer. On the other hand applescripts that are not copyrighted, may be free for the taking legally. But does the laws equal good morale?
While he's being semi-open about it I question the morale to package free scripts and charge for it without the explicit consent of the developer. On the other hand applescripts that are not copyrighted, may be free for the taking legally. But does the laws equal good morale?
Why Use Something for Free When You Can PAY for it? - Version: 1.7.7, 1/5/2008 05:06AM PST
sohateme
I've been using iTunes scripts from *Doug Adams* site for FREE for months. Of course, since some have proven to be invaluable, I've made a donation to Doug. He deserves it.
But, here I've found a "developer" [coughing] that CHARGES for many of these same scripts --- whether they represent original work or not.
Gosh, I've been using and enjoying the fruit of somebody's hard work for FREE when I could have paid somebody *else* for it --- whether *they* deserve to be paid or not?
Silly me.
But, here I've found a "developer" [coughing] that CHARGES for many of these same scripts --- whether they represent original work or not.
Gosh, I've been using and enjoying the fruit of somebody's hard work for FREE when I could have paid somebody *else* for it --- whether *they* deserve to be paid or not?
Silly me.
While he's being semi-open about it I question the morale to package free scripts and charge for it without the explicit consent of the developer. On the other hand applescripts that are not copyrighted, may be free for the taking legally. But does the laws equal good morale?