Existing users, 
 SurfRabbit - 1.2.3 betacustomize how web pages are displayed |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
All Feedback: 1 - 8 of 8
Blocks adds better than every other AddBlocker I tried 
- Version: 1.2.2, 2/23/2007 09:37AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
Ulrich Kapp
Blocks adds very reliable, especially the really bothering Flash adds, which, as far as I know, no other AddBlocker does without extensive configuring for every web page.
Stability problems with new version - Version: 1.2.2, 2/23/2007 07:10AM PST
(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)
richard_skaalerud
Safari 1.3.2 crashes when attempting to customize some pages. I am using OS X 10.3.9
waste: I how could destroy it - Version: 1.2.1, 10/26/2006 03:06PM PST
(0 of 4 users found this comment useful)
alberto2602
May 2006: I dowloaded SurfRubbit.
1 hour after: I de-installed it
October 2006: I've just SurfRubbitt as preferenve on my iDisk
Please, how can I destroy it?
1 hour after: I de-installed it
October 2006: I've just SurfRubbitt as preferenve on my iDisk
Please, how can I destroy it?
potential value - Version: 1.1, 3/14/2006 05:02PM PST
(2 of 3 users found this comment useful)
sjk
SurfRabbit has potential for improving my browsing experience but hasn't quite reached a certain "comfort zone" where I'll commit to using it and send a donation. Some of the issues, mostly interface/usability-related:
• Customizations aren't applied to pages opened in background tabs. Switching to the tab and refreshing the page is only a short-term workaround.
• Briefly: performance factors and possible font size problems affecting uncustomized pages.
• The Customizations tab would behave more intuitively if "Page Title" and "Apply settings to" fields were filled when a single item is selected with a mouse click and when moving between items with up/down arrow key navigation. Always having to double-click for those details is inefficient.
• In the Customizations tabs, some way to easily distinguishing between personal customizations and those added from the Rabbits tabs would be useful. Also, some indication of whether a customization uses Advanced Settings without clicking the button. And selecting a column header doesn't sort the column although that's been unimportant so far.
• The column view organization/navigation in the Rabbits tab makes it harder to discover new contributions. And there's no way at all to know if/when they've changed. Minimally, date added/modified and version compatibility info would be helpful. Personally, I'd prefer a simpler design that includes searching.
• Customizations aren't applied to pages opened in background tabs. Switching to the tab and refreshing the page is only a short-term workaround.
• Briefly: performance factors and possible font size problems affecting uncustomized pages.
• The Customizations tab would behave more intuitively if "Page Title" and "Apply settings to" fields were filled when a single item is selected with a mouse click and when moving between items with up/down arrow key navigation. Always having to double-click for those details is inefficient.
• In the Customizations tabs, some way to easily distinguishing between personal customizations and those added from the Rabbits tabs would be useful. Also, some indication of whether a customization uses Advanced Settings without clicking the button. And selecting a column header doesn't sort the column although that's been unimportant so far.
• The column view organization/navigation in the Rabbits tab makes it harder to discover new contributions. And there's no way at all to know if/when they've changed. Minimally, date added/modified and version compatibility info would be helpful. Personally, I'd prefer a simpler design that includes searching.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- potential value
Slows Safari down! - Version: 1.1, 3/13/2006 10:45AM PST
(4 of 5 users found this comment useful)
a153957
it is a nice product, but it does slow down my browsing, pages take twice as long to load.
A good simple blocker 
- Version: 1.01, 2/15/2006 06:26PM PST
(3 of 3 users found this comment useful)
kelvSYC
Doesn't block out iframe elements or "interactive objects" such as Flash. However, it's pretty good at blocking most other stuff.
It's a good alternative to other blockers such as PithHelmet, which requires programming knowledge. However, it is not as flexible. I like the CSS injection, but wish that we could also do our own DOM injection. All in all, it's a basic yet powerful blocker that will appease almost everyone.
XPath support would certainly help this application be better, and more advanced features might make SurfRabbit the Greasemonkey for Safari.
It's a good alternative to other blockers such as PithHelmet, which requires programming knowledge. However, it is not as flexible. I like the CSS injection, but wish that we could also do our own DOM injection. All in all, it's a basic yet powerful blocker that will appease almost everyone.
XPath support would certainly help this application be better, and more advanced features might make SurfRabbit the Greasemonkey for Safari.
Fantastic app! - Version: 1.0, 1/31/2006 02:12PM PST
(4 of 4 users found this comment useful)
Phat Banker
I love this thing. I've been customizing sites for an hour now! Really comes in handy on news sites with weird page elements that interfere with printing.
The click to remove function is intuitive and easy. Sometimes there's a stubborn piece of code that doesn't want to be removed, or automatically selects its much larger parent, but those are rare.
I'm curious to see how this application will grow.
The click to remove function is intuitive and easy. Sometimes there's a stubborn piece of code that doesn't want to be removed, or automatically selects its much larger parent, but those are rare.
I'm curious to see how this application will grow.
btw - please fix the Safari issue.