Existing users, 
 BSNES - 0.4.8Cycle-exact Super Nintendo emulator. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
Freeware? - Version: 0.3.4, 8/19/2008 01:10PM PST
(1 of 3 users found this comment useful)
matthew.herberg
I don't think the classification freeware applies to this product. Yes, you are able to use it freely but some features are crippled without paying.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- Freeware?
VT should add to the system requirements; - Version: 0.2.9, 3/3/2008 11:09PM PST
(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)
friedchikkin
"...at least a G5 CPU..."
*thumbs up for cycle exact* - Version: 0.2.9, 3/3/2008 11:10AM PST
(2 of 3 users found this comment useful)
MacAdict4Life
Considering games that I played properly on SNES9X, like Stunt Race FX, run just fine on BSNES... well I guess cycle exact helps me a bit there, hmm?
You use SNES9X until you have a reason to want cycle-exact emulation, and an ability to run it. I had the former for a long time. Now I have the later too, and suddenly I don't even keep SNES9X on my hard drive.
It's not that it's a bad emulator, it's that it cannot run every game flawlessly. Your more efficient emulator may run 98% of games fine, but I have all of them, and I want them all to run perfectly.
I just don't understand the hostility. It's a free emulator that works perfectly, sacrificing efficiency. There's another free emulator that sacrifices flawless playability for efficiency. Do I rage against SNES9X because it can't play a handful of games, and I have the computer power to handle emulation that can play them all? No. So why do you rage against BSNES over the fact that you lack the computer power to run it? You have your free alternative, and this isn't even a competition. Let it go!
You use SNES9X until you have a reason to want cycle-exact emulation, and an ability to run it. I had the former for a long time. Now I have the later too, and suddenly I don't even keep SNES9X on my hard drive.
It's not that it's a bad emulator, it's that it cannot run every game flawlessly. Your more efficient emulator may run 98% of games fine, but I have all of them, and I want them all to run perfectly.
I just don't understand the hostility. It's a free emulator that works perfectly, sacrificing efficiency. There's another free emulator that sacrifices flawless playability for efficiency. Do I rage against SNES9X because it can't play a handful of games, and I have the computer power to handle emulation that can play them all? No. So why do you rage against BSNES over the fact that you lack the computer power to run it? You have your free alternative, and this isn't even a competition. Let it go!
