Existing users, 
 QuickTerm - 1.01serial terminal emulator |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Information Related to Version:
Broken Link? Newer Version? Tell us!
Product Description:
QuickTerm is a basic ASCII terminal emulator. It can use any attached serial port, whether built-in or installed using an adapter such as a Keyspan USB-to-serial adapter. It allows full setting of serial port parameters, with or without handshaking. The name QuickTerm alludes to the fact that I developed it quickly, forsaking features I don't need to get a decent serial terminal emulator up and running.
What's new in this version:
- Universal binary.
- Resolved an unused feature in the NIB file which prevented compatibility with OS X v10.2.
- Added 110 to baud rate drop-down list.
Operating System Requirements:
This product is designed to run on the following operating systems:
- Mac OS X 10.4 Intel
- Mac OS X 10.4 PPC
- Mac OS X 10.3.9
- Mac OS X 10.3
- Mac OS X 10.2
Additional Requirements:
- Mac OS X 10.2 or higher
Screenshots:
Download Links:
Download QuickTerm Now (File Size: 143k)
Your Installed Versions:
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
Speed limited? - Version: 1.01, 10/12/2007 12:23AM PST
matt68000
Is it me or is this limited to 19,200 baud? I need to connect to my target platform at 115,200. Is this simply a gui limitation that I can work around or a hard app limitation? I know my USB-serial can work at that speed with other OSes.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- Speed limited?
YOU ROCK!!!!!!! - Version: 1.01, 5/14/2007 08:20AM PST
_adri_
QuickTerm is the best terminal I have ever tried, cause it runs smoothly, it's polite, easy to use, and really nice! Also compliments for the really cool icon!!!
I think that instead of implementing data transfer protocols (for which already exist many other solutions) you could achieve the best possible experience just adding support for higher speeds.
In example, could you add speeds of 460800bps and 921600bps?
Consider that many usb-serial chips out there (ftdi, prolific, etc.) are able to communicate at the above mentioned speeds, but a terminal emulator which can take care of such speeds still doesn't exist yet.
If you would add such feature, people would be able to use QuickTerm to test the functionality of their usb-serial based microcontrollers.
Again compliments!!!
I think that instead of implementing data transfer protocols (for which already exist many other solutions) you could achieve the best possible experience just adding support for higher speeds.
In example, could you add speeds of 460800bps and 921600bps?
Consider that many usb-serial chips out there (ftdi, prolific, etc.) are able to communicate at the above mentioned speeds, but a terminal emulator which can take care of such speeds still doesn't exist yet.
If you would add such feature, people would be able to use QuickTerm to test the functionality of their usb-serial based microcontrollers.
Again compliments!!!
Very nice ... but - Version: 1.01, 3/26/2006 01:34AM PST
charmanta
for real usage you should implement at least some standard emulations like vt100 and vt320 ( 7 + 8 bit ) ... and i would wish a simple rz receiver ( or rx, ry ).
The way it responds to CR signals sent from the host seems to be unusual, too.
The way it responds to CR signals sent from the host seems to be unusual, too.
