Flock - 2.0new type of web browser |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
Can we have Flock without a browser...?! - Version: 2.0b2, 7/20/2008 11:30AM PST
(1 of 2 users found this comment useful)
:: MILE ::
Useful as an extra app. 



- Version: 1.2.3, 7/16/2008 01:23AM PST
(3 of 3 users found this comment useful)
sheepguy42
Flock is a specialty browser... 



- Version: 1.2.1, 5/31/2008 08:53AM PST
(4 of 4 users found this comment useful)
leoofborg1* Aggregating media and content [RSS updates from Facebook, Flickr, Digg, etc]
* Updates from your 'Friends' [also via the above].
* Blogging. Since I've moved to LiveJournal, which is a bit clunky, the one off web blogger in Flock is a lot more apropo than say, Ecto or MarsEdit.
I'm sure that if you bug the Flock people that MAYBE they'd add USPS label printing from eBay or whatever if enough users wanted it. Tho', probably not.
As to the password thing this is something endemic to Gecko based browsers. Some of the browsers have it down [Camino], some may not.
If you want consistency, then use 1Password. I [also] do.
Flock is not crapware by any stretch of the imagination. If you want an 'all things to all people' application, be prepared to shell out the dough. If you really want examples of crapware read my last review... [smirk]