Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac OS X  |  Web & Software Development  |  Components / Libraries  |  Asbru Web Content Editor

Asbru Web Content Editor

Asbru Web Content Editor - 7.0.16

wysiwyg html/xhtml editor

All Time: (4.0)
This Version: Not rated (0.0)
Current Version: 7.0.16
Release Date: 2008-03-03
License: Update
Downloads (this version): 1,347
Downloads (all versions): 10,485
Price: $45.00

Information Related to Version:

Broken Link? Newer Version? Tell us!

Product Description:

Cross-browser/cross-platform WYSIWYG HTML/XHTML web content editor component for web designers/programmers to integrate with their own and third-party web applications to give non-technical users access to create and update web content. Example usage: Replace simple TEXTAREA input fields in your own or third-party web applications such as contact forms, message boards, web email systems and web content management systems with the Asbru Web Content Editor.

What's new in this version:

This release adds improved third-party web application support.

Operating System Requirements:

This product is designed to run on the following operating systems:

  • Mac OS X 10.5 PPC
  • Mac OS X 10.4 PPC
  • Mac OS X 10.3.9
  • Mac OS X 10.3
  • Mac OS X 10.2
  • Mac OS X 10.1
  • Mac OS X 10.0

Additional Requirements:

  • Safari (v2.0.1+) on Mac OS X
  • Microsoft Internet Explorer (v4.0+) on Windows
  • Netscape (v7.1+), Mozilla (v1.3+) and Mozilla Firefox/Firebird (v0.7+) on Microsoft Windows, Macintosh, Linux and Unix
  • Epiphany and Galeon on Linux

Screenshots:

Download Links:

Your Installed Versions:


 

Feedback Summary:

This Version:
Overall Rating: Not rated (0.0) Features: Not rated (0.0) Support: Not rated (0.0)
Ease of Use: Not rated (0.0) Quality / Stability: Not rated (0.0) Price: Not rated (0.0)
Add Your Feedback

Key to Types of Feedback:

ReviewsReviews   TroubleshootingTroubleshooting   Usage TipsUsage Tips   Developer NotesDeveloper Notes   CommentaryCommentary   Featured ReviewsFeatured Reviews

Asbru Web Content Editor CommentaryLooks really cool - Version: 7.0.8, 9/10/2007 06:11PM PST

(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)

julia2
I think I could really use this and am considering investing the money (reasonably priced) but am hesitating over whether or not I want to spend the time to figure it all out. The documentation is pretty extensive and pretty well-written, but the PDF file bookmarks don't work, making navigating the docs a real pain. I suggest the developers create live bookmarks in the PDF docs.

I think that sales of this product would increase if they would include a succinct description of exactly how the thing works in practice, both on the website and early in the docs. I had to dig and dig until I finally found a simple explanation on Page 44 of a 61-page manual. You have to embed some HTML FORM code into a page (they supply some examples) and then when you access the "editor" page (PHP, JS, ASP, etc.) it posts the edited data into the page with the FORM. I kept scratching my head and digging through the docs trying to figure out how they control access to the editor,, when I stumbled across this line:

"Please note that you should restrict access to your copies of the editor file (i.e. using your web server‟s access control features or by keeping the file names secret), or any Internet user with access to your website and knowledge of your “editor” file names may be able to update that content on your website."

If they'd mentioned that earlier much would have been clear much sooner. They're probably so close to the product that they think this stuff is self-evident, but to someone like me who's never done forms, it's not.

If they made a trial version easily available then I'm sure everything would become plain also, but they don't.
Post a commentAlert Admin

Asbru Web Content Editor ReviewReply to Comments - Version: 6.0.24, 3/21/2007 05:16AM PST

info617 (Asbru Ltd.)

Thank you for your valuable comments about the Asbru Web Content Editor. Please see below for a reply to the comments:

GUI Design
We are currently improving the GUI by adding the possibility to have drop-down menus for text formatting and editing/insertion of tables, form and positioning. This will make the editor toolbar look more compact. We are also adding new updated skins.

Installation Instructions and demo version of software
The full User & Developer Guide with installation and usage instructions is freely available for download from our website, and a free trial version of the full software is available on request (but not for anonymous download and to anonymous email addresses such myemail@yahoo.com).

Price
Our basic software license price is £25 for the basic single-server website software license. We haven't changed the price since the first version in 2003. It shouldn't be listed at a price of £45 anywhere on our website. Please let us know if you see it listed at a price of £45 anywhere.

Free Alternatives
What most free alternatives don't have are:

  • Full support for advanced functionality in Safari.
    As FPS mentioned the usable functionality in Apples Webkit is limited, which is why it is not straightforward to make everything work in Safari. However, we have spent a considerable amount of time and have managed to provide an editor with full support for advanced functionality in Safari.
  • Media and File Managers to enable you to upload images and files to your web server for both ASP, ASP.NET, ColdFusion, JSP and PHP.
  • And of course support.


Best Regards,

David Fisher
Asbru Software

Post a commentAlert Admin

Asbru Web Content Editor ReviewInteresting . . . - Version: 6.0.22, 10/16/2006 08:30AM PST

(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)

hkim
This web editor is quite chock full of tools for creating web pages and it seems to work well, based upon the trial available on their website. My only complaint is that the GUI reminds me of Ventura publisher (late 1980s) or Finale in that it has tool palettes like crazy. It is disorientating and is not very elegant. I would encourage the developer to streamline where possible since this looks like a interesting and useful tool to use.
Post a commentAlert Admin