TheRecipeManager - 2.2.0recipe management, meal scheduling |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
missing parts 



- Version: 2.0.0, 7/28/2006 09:15PM PST
saltedgreens
There is no trial. I thought I would try and tell. I want to rush through this because a couple of my dislikes of the program has me not using it at all.
Organization is flexible. I can create my own categories for foods which for me is awesome because I use recipes that fit several traditional categories depending upon their usage. I like this.
It puts a data folder in my home document folder. I thought this was ugly to look at. They could have put it in my library under preferences or application support or something.
It does not include the "servings" field on printouts. I wanted a program suited for professional needs (like it claims on its website). Not including a "servings" field on printouts for my cooks is not acceptable.
It does not include a "yield" field. It does allow for a range in the "servings" field, but this helps little. I use recipes that yield, lets say 1 quart. The number of servings depends on the use (for appetizer of entrée).
I was told that it could batch export. Yea, in its own format. It will also batch export in a text file, but as one single text file. Not too helpful for me.
Seems like it could be good, but it misses the mark too much for my taste. Money down the disposal. Hope this helps others at least.
Organization is flexible. I can create my own categories for foods which for me is awesome because I use recipes that fit several traditional categories depending upon their usage. I like this.
It puts a data folder in my home document folder. I thought this was ugly to look at. They could have put it in my library under preferences or application support or something.
It does not include the "servings" field on printouts. I wanted a program suited for professional needs (like it claims on its website). Not including a "servings" field on printouts for my cooks is not acceptable.
It does not include a "yield" field. It does allow for a range in the "servings" field, but this helps little. I use recipes that yield, lets say 1 quart. The number of servings depends on the use (for appetizer of entrée).
I was told that it could batch export. Yea, in its own format. It will also batch export in a text file, but as one single text file. Not too helpful for me.
Seems like it could be good, but it misses the mark too much for my taste. Money down the disposal. Hope this helps others at least.
missing parts 



- Version: 2.0.0, 7/28/2006 09:13PM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
saltedgreens
There is no trial. I thought I would try and tell. I want to rush through this because a couple of my dislikes of the program has me not using it at all.
Organization is flexible. I can create my own categories for foods which for me is awesome because I use recipes that fit several traditional categories depending upon their usage. I like this.
It puts a data folder in my home document folder. I thought this was ugly to look at. They could have put it in my library under preferences or application support or something.
It does not include the "servings" field on printouts. I wanted a program suited for professional needs (like it claims on its website). Not including a "servings" field on printouts for my cooks is not acceptable.
It does not include a "yield" field. It does allow for a range in the "servings" field, but this helps little. I use recipes that yield, lets say 1 quart. The number of servings depends on the use (for appetizer of entrée).
I was told that it could batch export. Yea, in its own format. It will also batch export in a text file, but as one single text file. Not too helpful for me.
Seems like it could be good, but it misses the mark too much for my taste. Money down the disposal. Hope this helps others at least.
Organization is flexible. I can create my own categories for foods which for me is awesome because I use recipes that fit several traditional categories depending upon their usage. I like this.
It puts a data folder in my home document folder. I thought this was ugly to look at. They could have put it in my library under preferences or application support or something.
It does not include the "servings" field on printouts. I wanted a program suited for professional needs (like it claims on its website). Not including a "servings" field on printouts for my cooks is not acceptable.
It does not include a "yield" field. It does allow for a range in the "servings" field, but this helps little. I use recipes that yield, lets say 1 quart. The number of servings depends on the use (for appetizer of entrée).
I was told that it could batch export. Yea, in its own format. It will also batch export in a text file, but as one single text file. Not too helpful for me.
Seems like it could be good, but it misses the mark too much for my taste. Money down the disposal. Hope this helps others at least.
Sorry, I am not spending my hard earned money on any application I have not gotten to at least run with some limitations for evaluation!
Chalk up a possible lost sell!
Even applications that sell for hundreds of dollars offer a potential customer a way of evaluation prior to demanding payment in full.