MacPorts - 1.8.1Install various open-source software packages on Mac OS X. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
Separate downloads for Snow Leopard, Leopard and Tiger... - Version: 1.8.1, 9/29/2009 12:52AM PST
friedchikkin
http://www.macports.org/install.php
Not for beginners - Version: 1.7.1, 4/1/2009 04:34AM PST
(3 of 3 users found this comment useful)
lawrencecpaulson_dotmac
It certainly isn't for beginners and amateurs, but it is very useful for people who need access to UNIX software. I stopped using Fink because it stopped working for me (I actually thought it had been discontinued). I have had no problems with MacPorts.
Unfair reviews 



- Version: 1.7.1, 3/29/2009 10:08AM PST
(4 of 4 users found this comment useful)
barone.cosimo
I believe that the last few comments are unfair. Although it is true that dependency problems exist for some ports and that the project is not as mature and reliable as, say, Debian's aptitude or maybe even Fink, it is an invaluable tool in many circumstances, especially for developers. It nearly always has up-to-date versions of its ports, whereas Fink (at least in the past – cannot judge because I do not use it now) had obsolete versions of many packages. It has packages that you would not find anywhere else (not even in Fink) and you would have to compile yourself if needed. The fact that it does not link to OS X's libraries but it needs to install its own has proved to be a plus, not a drawback, in my past experience: I can install the most recent releases of Boost libraries, Ruby, PHP, Perl, Apache, etc… without touching OS X. Even better, I can make MacPorts's versions coexist with OS X's ones. MacPorts, in my opinion, is the way to go for MySQL and PostgreSQL: all the other distributions I've seen lack some libraries or scatter things in folders like Library, Framework, etc… making it difficult sometimes to undo an installation. With MacPorts, with a simple command I'm done with all I need (including a launchd item to start and stop the server). And I *know* where all the files are. Finally, if I screw up MacPorts, as a last resort I may simply trash its folder and reinstall (never needed to to do that in the last two years). The few times I have had problems installing a package, a Google search has solved my problem.
Overall, MacPorts is not "to be avoided", it is "mostly needed" if you are developing on Mac OS X.
Overall, MacPorts is not "to be avoided", it is "mostly needed" if you are developing on Mac OS X.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- Why are they unfair?