VitaminSEE - 0.7.1.2fast image browser |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
almost perfect 



- Version: 0.7.1, 3/22/2006 12:04AM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
M.B.Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- almost perfect
Very fast indeed, good start... 



- Version: 0.7.0, 2/21/2006 06:58AM PST
tonycpsu
Also, I know it's probably tough, but the ability to store all thumbnails in a central database (instead of in the resource fork) would be nice, for those of us who store our folders on network shares.
Most Recent Replies: View All 2 Replies
- Very fast indeed, good start... (1 replies)
Still not fast enough for me ... - Version: 0.6.4.2, 8/29/2005 01:56AM PST
Herwig Henseler (Herwig Henseler)
This is what supposedly all modern digital camera owners do: Wade through the loads of pictures and deleting the bad ones, somethimes deciding which one of three or four almost identical pictures is worth to keep and switching between them _fast_. Each picture has to be viewed and judged, so there is enough time for preloading and prerendering threads to prepare the next images.
VitaminSEE may be fast ... but not faster than GC which I use so far for my sorting tasks so far. I'll gladly pay some shareware fee if my wishes come true ...
Most Recent Replies: View All 3 Replies