Existing users, 
 Data Calculator - 0.97audio storage space calculator |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Information Related to Version:
Broken Link? Newer Version? Tell us!
Product Description:
I've used some other data calculators in my work, and they all never seemed to have the friendliest interface, so I whipped my own up, using a slide-rule (!) as my design inspiration. The app launches fast, is very small, and can give you the info you need very, very fast because of the user interface.
What's new in this version:
- Fixed another bug in the time display, was giving inaccurate values.
- Compiled under Intel. Now Rosetta and 10.5 tested.
Operating System Requirements:
This product is designed to run on the following operating systems:
- Mac OS X 10.5 Intel
- Mac OS X 10.5 PPC
- Mac OS X 10.4 Intel
- Mac OS X 10.4 PPC
- Mac OS X 10.3.9
- Mac OS X 10.3
Additional Requirements:
- Mac OS X 10.3 or higher
Screenshots:
Download Links:
Download Data Calculator Now (File Size: 51k)
Your Installed Versions:
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
Seems to be broken. OSX10.4.11 Intel iMac - Version: 0.97, 1/2/2008 12:04AM PST
RoyPDX
Bounces once in the doc and dies.
very useful but need more tracks - Version: 0.92, 3/14/2005 06:09AM PST
wim Daans
very useful program indeed . It'll save me a lot of time calculating .
It would be nice to have a higher trackcount though . I need up to 72 tracks sometimes , and there's definetely people out there needing more : why not go to 128 to make it a nice number ?
Also there's a strange jump from 1h29min to 2h30min .
anyway thanks a lot for this nice utility ... hope to see an update soon
It would be nice to have a higher trackcount though . I need up to 72 tracks sometimes , and there's definetely people out there needing more : why not go to 128 to make it a nice number ?
Also there's a strange jump from 1h29min to 2h30min .
anyway thanks a lot for this nice utility ... hope to see an update soon
44100 would be very useful 
- Version: 0.9, 2/14/2005 09:27PM PST
joshiz
I agree, 44.1kHz should be a standard option. Even though a lot of people record in 24 bit, it is still at 44.1kHz. Great idea though.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- 44100 would be very useful
