Apple iWork - '06productivity suite: Pages & Keynote |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| Version '06: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Features: | Support: | |||
| Ease of Use: | Quality / Stability: | Price: | |||
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
Sheesh, shades of Microsoft - Version: 9.0.3, 9/29/2009 09:14AM PST
(1 of 5 users found this comment useful)
richard_tomkins_dotmacMost Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- Sheesh, shades of Microsoft
"Caution" No locking cells - Version: 9.0.2, 5/29/2009 12:31PM PST
(2 of 3 users found this comment useful)
h.toelle
So far I have only used the Numbers portion of this package due to time constraints. But not having the feature of locking cells is in the opinion of some reviewers and many users a real drawback. I would whole heartedly agree, further I sincerely hope that Apple will re-instate this feature in a future release.
It is note worthy, users like myself have been able to almost entirely replicate this feature by using some creative techniques found right in Numbers along with its ability to produce shapes. Although it does not cure it entirely, what remains uncured in most cases is likely not that important.
More information on this may be found at the Apple forums.
Or Google
"Apple's Numbers no locked cells "
Also Might I suggest contacting Apple let them know of your feelings. The more they hear the more apt they are do act.
Thank you for your attention
It is note worthy, users like myself have been able to almost entirely replicate this feature by using some creative techniques found right in Numbers along with its ability to produce shapes. Although it does not cure it entirely, what remains uncured in most cases is likely not that important.
More information on this may be found at the Apple forums.
Or Google
"Apple's Numbers no locked cells "
Also Might I suggest contacting Apple let them know of your feelings. The more they hear the more apt they are do act.
Thank you for your attention
'09 is the Office replacement 



- Version: 9.0.2, 5/28/2009 05:15PM PST
(4 of 5 users found this comment useful)
iayork
OK, that's not quite true, but iWorks '09 is the first release for which that's not a ridiculous statement. Very briefly, I find Pages much nicer than Word, Numbers about equal to Excel (I use both, depending on my needs), and Keynote not quite as useful as PowerPoint. (This is true for both Office '08 and '04.)
I use Pages to write scientific papers and documents. I need moderately fancy layout capabilities (to incorporate graphics into my documents) and aside from that I need it to stay out of my way. Pages loads much faster and is much more responsive than Word, and it's more stable. Incorporating graphics into my documents is so much easier than Word I can't begin to tell you how much time I've saved. Importing and exporting from and to Word is seamless (occasionally there are notes that something didn't import perfectly, but I can rarely spot the difference even when it's flagged). Exporting to Word on the fly -- directly to email, for example -- is effortless and completely solves the problem of collaboration. In earlier versions of iWorks I had problems with references and bibliographies, but Bookends (from Sonny Software) works fine with '09. (I understand Endnote does as well, but haven't tried it.) I only fire up Word these days when I forget and double-click on a doc instead of the faster right-clicking and opening in Pages.
Numbers has finally grown up. I couldn't use the previous version because it couldn't do a number of things (error bars and trend lines were the two worst, as I recall) but they're now working fine. There are still a couple problems -- Excel imports CSV and tab-delimited files much better -- but Numbers' workflow and model seems much more sensible now that I'm used to it. Again, Numbers launches faster and is more responsive and stable than Excel. I use Numbers for about 80% of my charting/spreadsheet needs.
Keynote, I rarely use, though it's certainly not bad. PowerPoint seems a little more versatile, and though Keynote probably has better templates and transitions, I don't use templates or transitions much. Powerpoint is nicer for exporting in different formats (e.g. as notes) which is important since it lets me output my lectures as notes very easily.
All in all, the package as a whole is as useful as Office. Depending on your specific needs you might have some requirement for an Office feature that's not present in iWorks, but for the vast majority I think iWorks would be at least as function, and I think for almost everyone it's going to be faster, more responsive, and just easier to use.
I use Pages to write scientific papers and documents. I need moderately fancy layout capabilities (to incorporate graphics into my documents) and aside from that I need it to stay out of my way. Pages loads much faster and is much more responsive than Word, and it's more stable. Incorporating graphics into my documents is so much easier than Word I can't begin to tell you how much time I've saved. Importing and exporting from and to Word is seamless (occasionally there are notes that something didn't import perfectly, but I can rarely spot the difference even when it's flagged). Exporting to Word on the fly -- directly to email, for example -- is effortless and completely solves the problem of collaboration. In earlier versions of iWorks I had problems with references and bibliographies, but Bookends (from Sonny Software) works fine with '09. (I understand Endnote does as well, but haven't tried it.) I only fire up Word these days when I forget and double-click on a doc instead of the faster right-clicking and opening in Pages.
Numbers has finally grown up. I couldn't use the previous version because it couldn't do a number of things (error bars and trend lines were the two worst, as I recall) but they're now working fine. There are still a couple problems -- Excel imports CSV and tab-delimited files much better -- but Numbers' workflow and model seems much more sensible now that I'm used to it. Again, Numbers launches faster and is more responsive and stable than Excel. I use Numbers for about 80% of my charting/spreadsheet needs.
Keynote, I rarely use, though it's certainly not bad. PowerPoint seems a little more versatile, and though Keynote probably has better templates and transitions, I don't use templates or transitions much. Powerpoint is nicer for exporting in different formats (e.g. as notes) which is important since it lets me output my lectures as notes very easily.
All in all, the package as a whole is as useful as Office. Depending on your specific needs you might have some requirement for an Office feature that's not present in iWorks, but for the vast majority I think iWorks would be at least as function, and I think for almost everyone it's going to be faster, more responsive, and just easier to use.
Most Recent Replies: View All 3 Replies
For a company that has engineered a number of word editing programs, you'd think they'd get it right. Do you remember Claris and AppleWorks?
Pages cannot properly number text in a manual and it can hardly do a Table of Contents properly.
I am not a spreadsheet power user, but I must say, I tried to import text data using all the instructions in help and the manual and it never worked, it just beeped.
And OS X 10.5 is really miserable. The terrible changes in Mail and iCal are, well, miserable.
As I thought about all this the other day, I can comfortably say that there is now no redeeming value of Apple products over that of a simple PC and Windows. They are both the same. A mishmash of broken and removed features and bugs and the only thing neither of them do much any more is crash. Big deal.
The next computer will be a PC and Windows 7 will probably be on it.
Goodbye Apple, you've alienated your once secure user bas one time too many.