Existing users, 
 Apple iWork 09 - 9.0.3Productivity suite: Pages, Keynote, Numbers |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
Sheesh, shades of Microsoft - Version: 9.0.3, 9/29/2009 09:14AM PST
(1 of 5 users found this comment useful)
richard_tomkins_dotmac
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- Sheesh, shades of Microsoft
"Caution" No locking cells - Version: 9.0.2, 5/29/2009 12:31PM PST
(2 of 3 users found this comment useful)
h.toelle
So far I have only used the Numbers portion of this package due to time constraints. But not having the feature of locking cells is in the opinion of some reviewers and many users a real drawback. I would whole heartedly agree, further I sincerely hope that Apple will re-instate this feature in a future release.
It is note worthy, users like myself have been able to almost entirely replicate this feature by using some creative techniques found right in Numbers along with its ability to produce shapes. Although it does not cure it entirely, what remains uncured in most cases is likely not that important.
More information on this may be found at the Apple forums.
Or Google
"Apple's Numbers no locked cells "
Also Might I suggest contacting Apple let them know of your feelings. The more they hear the more apt they are do act.
Thank you for your attention
It is note worthy, users like myself have been able to almost entirely replicate this feature by using some creative techniques found right in Numbers along with its ability to produce shapes. Although it does not cure it entirely, what remains uncured in most cases is likely not that important.
More information on this may be found at the Apple forums.
Or Google
"Apple's Numbers no locked cells "
Also Might I suggest contacting Apple let them know of your feelings. The more they hear the more apt they are do act.
Thank you for your attention
'09 is the Office replacement 
- Version: 9.0.2, 5/28/2009 05:15PM PST
(4 of 5 users found this comment useful)
iayork
OK, that's not quite true, but iWorks '09 is the first release for which that's not a ridiculous statement. Very briefly, I find Pages much nicer than Word, Numbers about equal to Excel (I use both, depending on my needs), and Keynote not quite as useful as PowerPoint. (This is true for both Office '08 and '04.)
I use Pages to write scientific papers and documents. I need moderately fancy layout capabilities (to incorporate graphics into my documents) and aside from that I need it to stay out of my way. Pages loads much faster and is much more responsive than Word, and it's more stable. Incorporating graphics into my documents is so much easier than Word I can't begin to tell you how much time I've saved. Importing and exporting from and to Word is seamless (occasionally there are notes that something didn't import perfectly, but I can rarely spot the difference even when it's flagged). Exporting to Word on the fly -- directly to email, for example -- is effortless and completely solves the problem of collaboration. In earlier versions of iWorks I had problems with references and bibliographies, but Bookends (from Sonny Software) works fine with '09. (I understand Endnote does as well, but haven't tried it.) I only fire up Word these days when I forget and double-click on a doc instead of the faster right-clicking and opening in Pages.
Numbers has finally grown up. I couldn't use the previous version because it couldn't do a number of things (error bars and trend lines were the two worst, as I recall) but they're now working fine. There are still a couple problems -- Excel imports CSV and tab-delimited files much better -- but Numbers' workflow and model seems much more sensible now that I'm used to it. Again, Numbers launches faster and is more responsive and stable than Excel. I use Numbers for about 80% of my charting/spreadsheet needs.
Keynote, I rarely use, though it's certainly not bad. PowerPoint seems a little more versatile, and though Keynote probably has better templates and transitions, I don't use templates or transitions much. Powerpoint is nicer for exporting in different formats (e.g. as notes) which is important since it lets me output my lectures as notes very easily.
All in all, the package as a whole is as useful as Office. Depending on your specific needs you might have some requirement for an Office feature that's not present in iWorks, but for the vast majority I think iWorks would be at least as function, and I think for almost everyone it's going to be faster, more responsive, and just easier to use.
I use Pages to write scientific papers and documents. I need moderately fancy layout capabilities (to incorporate graphics into my documents) and aside from that I need it to stay out of my way. Pages loads much faster and is much more responsive than Word, and it's more stable. Incorporating graphics into my documents is so much easier than Word I can't begin to tell you how much time I've saved. Importing and exporting from and to Word is seamless (occasionally there are notes that something didn't import perfectly, but I can rarely spot the difference even when it's flagged). Exporting to Word on the fly -- directly to email, for example -- is effortless and completely solves the problem of collaboration. In earlier versions of iWorks I had problems with references and bibliographies, but Bookends (from Sonny Software) works fine with '09. (I understand Endnote does as well, but haven't tried it.) I only fire up Word these days when I forget and double-click on a doc instead of the faster right-clicking and opening in Pages.
Numbers has finally grown up. I couldn't use the previous version because it couldn't do a number of things (error bars and trend lines were the two worst, as I recall) but they're now working fine. There are still a couple problems -- Excel imports CSV and tab-delimited files much better -- but Numbers' workflow and model seems much more sensible now that I'm used to it. Again, Numbers launches faster and is more responsive and stable than Excel. I use Numbers for about 80% of my charting/spreadsheet needs.
Keynote, I rarely use, though it's certainly not bad. PowerPoint seems a little more versatile, and though Keynote probably has better templates and transitions, I don't use templates or transitions much. Powerpoint is nicer for exporting in different formats (e.g. as notes) which is important since it lets me output my lectures as notes very easily.
All in all, the package as a whole is as useful as Office. Depending on your specific needs you might have some requirement for an Office feature that's not present in iWorks, but for the vast majority I think iWorks would be at least as function, and I think for almost everyone it's going to be faster, more responsive, and just easier to use.
Most Recent Replies: View All 3 Replies
Keynote & Numbers -good Pages - bleh. - Version: 9.0.1update1, 5/20/2009 10:52PM PST
(1 of 7 users found this comment useful)
rubaiyat
I have tried so hard to like Pages. There is probably no program I have worked harder at trying get it do what it is supposed to do.
Unfortunately it is Apple's muddled shot at a DTP program, sort of, oh and a Word Processor, sort of. As in the movie "The Fly" the two seem to have had the worst of each others DNA fused. Full of bone headed ideas about user interaction which go to show why no-one else is reinventing the wheel to put several corners on it. All poorly support by useless Help and a really poorly written User Guide.
At face value it looks OK. Nice looking interface with <i>very</i> good templates. Scratch the surface and try to do real work and you find the mess beneath.
It has a crazy split between "Word Processing mode" and "Layout mode" because the Apple programmers didn't have a clue how to just get it to do both. Odd unannounced functions fail in one or the other. Strangest of all the Word Processor has the somewhat primitive Master Pages and Layout has none. The Layout mode is the more shambolic of the 2 with so many things that don't work it would be hard to list them all.
The Spelling checker in both has to be one of the worst implemented of any program I have ever seen. It is constantly confounding users and seems mostly to just not work. Period.
WARNING TIM ROBINSON: Do not take anything produced from this to a commercial printer. This is strictly for your desktop printer.
WARNING: Do not believe Apple's assurances of compatibility with Ms Office. To give this its technical definition, that is largely a lie. So much does not work either opening or saving to Word that it is just better avoided and only used as a last resort.
WARNING: Be prepared to spend a lot of time finding out how to do things and what has gone wrong. Again! The documentation and Help plain suck.
As this is a review of iWork I have to say that Keynote and Numbers are both great products.
Pity Pages lets the suite down and leaves Apple users still without a decent Word Processor or Database since Apple terminated AppleWorks.
Unfortunately it is Apple's muddled shot at a DTP program, sort of, oh and a Word Processor, sort of. As in the movie "The Fly" the two seem to have had the worst of each others DNA fused. Full of bone headed ideas about user interaction which go to show why no-one else is reinventing the wheel to put several corners on it. All poorly support by useless Help and a really poorly written User Guide.
At face value it looks OK. Nice looking interface with <i>very</i> good templates. Scratch the surface and try to do real work and you find the mess beneath.
It has a crazy split between "Word Processing mode" and "Layout mode" because the Apple programmers didn't have a clue how to just get it to do both. Odd unannounced functions fail in one or the other. Strangest of all the Word Processor has the somewhat primitive Master Pages and Layout has none. The Layout mode is the more shambolic of the 2 with so many things that don't work it would be hard to list them all.
The Spelling checker in both has to be one of the worst implemented of any program I have ever seen. It is constantly confounding users and seems mostly to just not work. Period.
WARNING TIM ROBINSON: Do not take anything produced from this to a commercial printer. This is strictly for your desktop printer.
WARNING: Do not believe Apple's assurances of compatibility with Ms Office. To give this its technical definition, that is largely a lie. So much does not work either opening or saving to Word that it is just better avoided and only used as a last resort.
WARNING: Be prepared to spend a lot of time finding out how to do things and what has gone wrong. Again! The documentation and Help plain suck.
As this is a review of iWork I have to say that Keynote and Numbers are both great products.
Pity Pages lets the suite down and leaves Apple users still without a decent Word Processor or Database since Apple terminated AppleWorks.
Most Recent Replies: View All 4 Replies
- Keynote & Numbers -good Pages - bleh. (1 replies)
A few improvements, but a lot of disappointments - Version: 09, 1/25/2009 06:45AM PST
(8 of 8 users found this comment useful)
N.K. Clark
Don't be fooled. This is not a truly new version of the iWork suite. Although it continues the strengths of iWork 2008, especially in Keynote, Apple has not addressed many of the weaknesses that prevent iWork from being a serious office suite suitable for business. For iWork 2008 users who can spare $79 to upgrade to iWork 2009, the investment is marginally worth it. If you want to save your money and skip this upgrade, you will not miss much.
All three applications deliver some improvements in terms of functionality, integration, and ease of use. Some of the improvements will be pleasant surprises, but I haven't found any breakthrough "must have" new features.
Pages and Numbers continue to be disappointing. Apple has not addressed some very basic weaknesses that prevent the two otherwise attractive applications from replacing Microsoft Office in most businesses that, like mine, produce a lot of documents and spreadsheets.
Global strengths:
Although Numbers and Pages do not have the functionality of Excel and Word, they are easier to learn and easier to use. As an experienced user of both suites, I find that I can create a document much faster in the iWork suite than using Microsoft Office.
On my basic MacBook, at least, the iWork applications run noticeably faster.
Global weaknesses:
The Help function remains vague for all three applications. The search function is inaccurate and the information, if you find it, is very basic.
iWork 09 file formats are not compatible with iWork 08. For organizations that use iWork 08, this is a significant disincentive to upgrade.
Files tend to be much larger than those produced by their counterparts in Microsoft Office.
iWork does not have an export or import capability for Open Document files. Currently more users worldwide use OpenOffice.org and NeoOffice, the two leading open source office suites for Mac, than iWork.
Pages:
Despite its shortcomings, Pages is easy to use. The user has a greater sense of "control" over what is happening on the screen than is sometimes the case with Word, especially with format changes. Formatting is much easier than with Word.
Pages continues to lack, however, several basic functions. I am sure that there are other shortcomings that annoy other users, but here is my list.
- You still cannot change paper size or orientation within a document. Instead, you must break the document into separate files.
- File sizes tend to be larger than in .doc format.
- Pages still lacks an auto-recover capability.
- The search and replace functions are still very primitive.
- Spell checking remains unreliable.
- You still cannot change text orientation in tables.
Numbers
I remain puzzled by Apple's apparent refusal to invest the relatively slight effort needed to make this application better than Excel. The tables-based structure of Numbers makes it much easier to use than Excel. It produces better looking spreadsheets. However, there are at least two weaknesses that keep it from being the first choice for individuals and businesses who need spreadsheets that not only look pretty but also do "industrial strength" data analysis.
- Numbers cannot link a cell in one spreadsheet file to a cell in another spreadsheet file.
- The charting function is very inflexible and primitive.
Keynote
Keynote remains vastly superior to Powerpoint. It is worth the $79 price just to have this application
Bottom line: I am disappointed that Apple would charge $79 for a version that introduces marginal improvements and leaves so many basic flaws unaddressed. I have to give iWork 09 a positive review, but there still are some curious weaknesses that prevent the suite from reaching its full potential.
All three applications deliver some improvements in terms of functionality, integration, and ease of use. Some of the improvements will be pleasant surprises, but I haven't found any breakthrough "must have" new features.
Pages and Numbers continue to be disappointing. Apple has not addressed some very basic weaknesses that prevent the two otherwise attractive applications from replacing Microsoft Office in most businesses that, like mine, produce a lot of documents and spreadsheets.
Global strengths:
Although Numbers and Pages do not have the functionality of Excel and Word, they are easier to learn and easier to use. As an experienced user of both suites, I find that I can create a document much faster in the iWork suite than using Microsoft Office.
On my basic MacBook, at least, the iWork applications run noticeably faster.
Global weaknesses:
The Help function remains vague for all three applications. The search function is inaccurate and the information, if you find it, is very basic.
iWork 09 file formats are not compatible with iWork 08. For organizations that use iWork 08, this is a significant disincentive to upgrade.
Files tend to be much larger than those produced by their counterparts in Microsoft Office.
iWork does not have an export or import capability for Open Document files. Currently more users worldwide use OpenOffice.org and NeoOffice, the two leading open source office suites for Mac, than iWork.
Pages:
Despite its shortcomings, Pages is easy to use. The user has a greater sense of "control" over what is happening on the screen than is sometimes the case with Word, especially with format changes. Formatting is much easier than with Word.
Pages continues to lack, however, several basic functions. I am sure that there are other shortcomings that annoy other users, but here is my list.
- You still cannot change paper size or orientation within a document. Instead, you must break the document into separate files.
- File sizes tend to be larger than in .doc format.
- Pages still lacks an auto-recover capability.
- The search and replace functions are still very primitive.
- Spell checking remains unreliable.
- You still cannot change text orientation in tables.
Numbers
I remain puzzled by Apple's apparent refusal to invest the relatively slight effort needed to make this application better than Excel. The tables-based structure of Numbers makes it much easier to use than Excel. It produces better looking spreadsheets. However, there are at least two weaknesses that keep it from being the first choice for individuals and businesses who need spreadsheets that not only look pretty but also do "industrial strength" data analysis.
- Numbers cannot link a cell in one spreadsheet file to a cell in another spreadsheet file.
- The charting function is very inflexible and primitive.
Keynote
Keynote remains vastly superior to Powerpoint. It is worth the $79 price just to have this application
Bottom line: I am disappointed that Apple would charge $79 for a version that introduces marginal improvements and leaves so many basic flaws unaddressed. I have to give iWork 09 a positive review, but there still are some curious weaknesses that prevent the suite from reaching its full potential.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
Find & Replace Functionality Still Too Limited for Full-time Use - Version: 09, 1/14/2009 01:02PM PST
(6 of 6 users found this comment useful)
Xiaopangzi
The following applies specifically to Pages ’09 rather than being attributable also to Numbers and Keynote.
Observations:
• Although still not as crisp and clear as text on a Word page, antialiased text in Pages ’09 is much less blurry than in previous versions of Pages, so Pages ’09 is now viable as a replacement of Microsoft Word, as long as Find & Replace functionality is significantly expanded in the near future.
• Unable to search for bold, italic, underlined, subscript, superscript, or highlighted text, or text with specific fonts, colors, etc., within documents in which the original writer did not define styles (did not use a style sheet).
• Unable to use clipboard content for Replace All, such as when replacing all instances of “CO2” with the equivalent that contains the proper subscript number.
• Unable to specifically search for only one-byte or two-byte characters within a document, unlike the Japanese version of Word (or with Japanese enabled via Microsoft Language Register).
• Unable to automatically convert double-byte characters to their single-byte equivalents or vice versa.
• Unable to search upward.
• Unable to search for combinations of unspecified numbers and letters or use any other wildcard searches.
• Unable to search for unspecified uppercase letters or combinations of uppercase and lowercase letters.
• Unable to highlight text if the desired color is already selected in the Apple, Developer, Crayons, and Web Safe Colors subpalettes in the Show Colors formatting palette, so a different neighboring color has to be temporarily selected before reselecting the desired color to be applied to the current text selection.
• Difficult to identify the applied highlight color of selected text, as the System Preference’s default Highlight Color is still used even for highlighted text instead of Pages using a color that directly contrasts with the applied highlight color, as is standard in Word.
• Word files with first line indentation lose most of their indentation when opened in Pages.
Desires:
• An option in Preferences that enables certain Views—especially Show Invisibles—by default for all documents, whether newly created or imported from Word format
• Access to the Inspector via the pointer while inputting search (and replace) criteria in the fields of the Find & Replace dialog box, as most documents do not have styles defined by the original author
• Ability to search across all open documents and search upward to find the previous instance of any criteria
• Fullest possible regular expression search via the Find & Replace dialog box but preferably selectable from a pulldown menu with natural user-friendly language.
• Ability to apply the currently selected color in the Show Colors palette as highlighting for any selected text via a single click (without having to deselect the desired color first) and then have immediate visual feedback that the highlighting has been successful by displaying the text selection highlight in a color that directly contrasts with the applied highlight color.
Observations:
• Although still not as crisp and clear as text on a Word page, antialiased text in Pages ’09 is much less blurry than in previous versions of Pages, so Pages ’09 is now viable as a replacement of Microsoft Word, as long as Find & Replace functionality is significantly expanded in the near future.
• Unable to search for bold, italic, underlined, subscript, superscript, or highlighted text, or text with specific fonts, colors, etc., within documents in which the original writer did not define styles (did not use a style sheet).
• Unable to use clipboard content for Replace All, such as when replacing all instances of “CO2” with the equivalent that contains the proper subscript number.
• Unable to specifically search for only one-byte or two-byte characters within a document, unlike the Japanese version of Word (or with Japanese enabled via Microsoft Language Register).
• Unable to automatically convert double-byte characters to their single-byte equivalents or vice versa.
• Unable to search upward.
• Unable to search for combinations of unspecified numbers and letters or use any other wildcard searches.
• Unable to search for unspecified uppercase letters or combinations of uppercase and lowercase letters.
• Unable to highlight text if the desired color is already selected in the Apple, Developer, Crayons, and Web Safe Colors subpalettes in the Show Colors formatting palette, so a different neighboring color has to be temporarily selected before reselecting the desired color to be applied to the current text selection.
• Difficult to identify the applied highlight color of selected text, as the System Preference’s default Highlight Color is still used even for highlighted text instead of Pages using a color that directly contrasts with the applied highlight color, as is standard in Word.
• Word files with first line indentation lose most of their indentation when opened in Pages.
Desires:
• An option in Preferences that enables certain Views—especially Show Invisibles—by default for all documents, whether newly created or imported from Word format
• Access to the Inspector via the pointer while inputting search (and replace) criteria in the fields of the Find & Replace dialog box, as most documents do not have styles defined by the original author
• Ability to search across all open documents and search upward to find the previous instance of any criteria
• Fullest possible regular expression search via the Find & Replace dialog box but preferably selectable from a pulldown menu with natural user-friendly language.
• Ability to apply the currently selected color in the Show Colors palette as highlighting for any selected text via a single click (without having to deselect the desired color first) and then have immediate visual feedback that the highlighting has been successful by displaying the text selection highlight in a color that directly contrasts with the applied highlight color.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
Apple getting as bad as Microsoft and Adobe. - Version: 09, 1/14/2009 05:45AM PST
(4 of 6 users found this comment useful)
grh-svo
This package behaves badly. It places aliases in the dock without asking permission first. This is not like Apple and it's crass hubris and arrogance.
I haven't gone further yet. I felt a need to point this out immediately.
I mean, I'm already grumpy that Apple, just like Microsoft and Adobe, chooses to package more than one app in a suite. Too bad if someone wants just one of the three apps.
I haven't gone further yet. I felt a need to point this out immediately.
I mean, I'm already grumpy that Apple, just like Microsoft and Adobe, chooses to package more than one app in a suite. Too bad if someone wants just one of the three apps.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
30-Day Trial Version Available. Use iPhone as Remote - Version: 09, 1/7/2009 11:18AM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
Edwin-schemer
1. Be aware that a 30-day fully functional trial version is available at the Apple web-site. Have only tried Keynote so far and it has lots of improvements (used it in a lecture last night).
2. I "splurged" 99 cents on the Keynote Remote App for the iPhone and it works beautifully.
The iPhone paired smoothly with the airport on my Macbook and in "landscape" mode the slides are quite readable on the iPhone. You just drag them in one after the other, and each "build" appears on a separate slide, so instead of clicking on your trackpad or remote, you just swipe your finger across the iPhone.
For frequent Keynote user who happen to have an iPhone or iPod touch, this alone makes the upgrade worthwhile, particularly at the academic price.
I am not a big fan of Pages. For me Emacs (or Aquamacs) with LaTeX (or TeXShop) are still the best publishing platform for papers or books involving mathematical formulas (and they are FREE).
2. I "splurged" 99 cents on the Keynote Remote App for the iPhone and it works beautifully.
The iPhone paired smoothly with the airport on my Macbook and in "landscape" mode the slides are quite readable on the iPhone. You just drag them in one after the other, and each "build" appears on a separate slide, so instead of clicking on your trackpad or remote, you just swipe your finger across the iPhone.
For frequent Keynote user who happen to have an iPhone or iPod touch, this alone makes the upgrade worthwhile, particularly at the academic price.
I am not a big fan of Pages. For me Emacs (or Aquamacs) with LaTeX (or TeXShop) are still the best publishing platform for papers or books involving mathematical formulas (and they are FREE).
why only Endnote X2? - Version: 09, 1/7/2009 03:39AM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
ozean
Why do we only get bibliography support for Endnote? If one looks at the reviews here it is plain obvious that Mac users prefer to use Bookends or Sente. *sigh* Hopefully, it will turn out that the people at the Pages programming team made used an architecture to support MathType and Endnote that offers similar access for other apps…
For a company that has engineered a number of word editing programs, you'd think they'd get it right. Do you remember Claris and AppleWorks?
Pages cannot properly number text in a manual and it can hardly do a Table of Contents properly.
I am not a spreadsheet power user, but I must say, I tried to import text data using all the instructions in help and the manual and it never worked, it just beeped.
And OS X 10.5 is really miserable. The terrible changes in Mail and iCal are, well, miserable.
As I thought about all this the other day, I can comfortably say that there is now no redeeming value of Apple products over that of a simple PC and Windows. They are both the same. A mishmash of broken and removed features and bugs and the only thing neither of them do much any more is crash. Big deal.
The next computer will be a PC and Windows 7 will probably be on it.
Goodbye Apple, you've alienated your once secure user bas one time too many.