iDefrag - 1.6.9Defragmentation & disk optimization. |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
iDefrag vs. SuperDuper - Version: 1.6.8, 6/8/2009 05:54AM PST
(0 of 2 users found this comment useful)
pendragon
Bull Sh*T - Version: 1.6.8, 3/20/2009 05:07PM PST
(1 of 6 users found this comment useful)
Ancient_Boii_TribeMost Recent Replies: View All 2 Replies
- Bull Sh*T
iDefrag Review 



- Version: 1.6.8, 3/19/2009 07:59PM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
glennbahTech support is also good the one time I needed it.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
SuperDuper allows me the option to erase a drive/volume prior to copying the backup. Doesn’t the erasing accomplish the same thing?
I know iDefrag has more bells and whistles (some are of no benefit to me) and it may defrag faster, but as I use/schedule SuperDuper while I sleep, I see no advantage there.
So for folks such as me, why use iDefrag?
No offense is intended to the developers, I just don’t understand.