Existing users, 
 sixtyforce - 0.9.2nintendo 64 emulator |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
Updates? - Version: 0.9.2, 9/20/2009 11:27AM PST
corradokid
Has anyone heard from Gerrit? His website says a new cocoa beta would be released "soon" but that was September 5th, 2008. While I'm assuming the project is dead I'm still holding onto some hope he's working on a version to take advantage of the newer Mac OS X and new Intel chipset features.
SixtyForce-Great App 
- Version: 0.8.0, 9/30/2008 06:56PM PST
Acwwismygame
Sixtyforce is a great emu. I registered, and using my Microsoft Procession Pro is great.Harvest Moon and F-Zero X run amazingly. I tested it on my iMac G3, with a 350 MHz processor, 192 RAM, and OS X Puma.
;) - Version: 0.9.0, 3/2/2007 06:19PM PST
(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)
friedchikkin
Honestly I can't wait to have $16 to support this work and the people—whom I think are nice—behind it. :)
Not bad. 
- Version: 0.8.0, 2/3/2007 09:54AM PST
(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)
bob742bomb
Well, this emualor for mac is not bad. It runs a little fast but, meh. Also, simple question: Is this gameshark compatable?
Thanks - Version: 0.9.0b1, 2/1/2007 11:45AM PST
(1 of 2 users found this comment useful)
weeedyweedsmoker
Thanks for the best gift to mac emulators. I'm happy everytime there is an update.
I don't get it. - Version: 0.9.0b1, 1/31/2007 09:11AM PST
(0 of 2 users found this comment useful)
paulduclac
An update per year (at max) almost no games are running.
And it's shareware... Why would I pay for this? (Sorry of this sounds aggressive, it's not).
And it's shareware... Why would I pay for this? (Sorry of this sounds aggressive, it's not).
First Impressions... - Version: 0.8.5, 1/28/2007 03:08AM PST
(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)
rhesuspieces00
I've been playing with Mupen64 and SixtyForce today to see how feasible it would be to play Ocarina of Time on my Powerbook (12" 1.67 GHz, OS 10.4.8, 1.25 GB ram). While things have improved dramatically since tried about a year ago, unless you have a newer faster machine, there is still a ways to go before it becomes enjoyable.
Mupen64 seems slightly faster than SixtyForce, but both are jerky on my machine, which makes the audio essentially unlistenable. Mupen supports more ROMs (e.g. Master Quest wouldn't get past the profile creation screen on SixtyForce), but Ocarina of Time seems to display the same glitches under both emulators. The deal breaker for me is that Mupen doesn't yet support USB gamepads. Navigating with arrow keys just doesn't do it for me. SixtyForce has a few more options on how you can configure the level of detail, some of which are buggy at this point, but with all the bells and whistles turned on, Ocarina is absolutely gorgeous, albeit unplayably slow.
I'm not putting a star-rating at this point, as it seems a bit unfair to rate the software this early in its development. Both look like they will be great emulators given another 6 to 12 months of development. If I get a new Intel iMac in that time, I might try it again to see how much the extra horsepower makes a difference.
Much thanks to the developers for all their efforts.
Mupen64 seems slightly faster than SixtyForce, but both are jerky on my machine, which makes the audio essentially unlistenable. Mupen supports more ROMs (e.g. Master Quest wouldn't get past the profile creation screen on SixtyForce), but Ocarina of Time seems to display the same glitches under both emulators. The deal breaker for me is that Mupen doesn't yet support USB gamepads. Navigating with arrow keys just doesn't do it for me. SixtyForce has a few more options on how you can configure the level of detail, some of which are buggy at this point, but with all the bells and whistles turned on, Ocarina is absolutely gorgeous, albeit unplayably slow.
I'm not putting a star-rating at this point, as it seems a bit unfair to rate the software this early in its development. Both look like they will be great emulators given another 6 to 12 months of development. If I get a new Intel iMac in that time, I might try it again to see how much the extra horsepower makes a difference.
Much thanks to the developers for all their efforts.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- First Impressions...
Better but a huge snag... - Version: 0.8.5, 11/4/2006 05:27PM PST
(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)
corradokid
When launching 0.8.5 for the first time, it will politely tell you it wants to make a copy of your saves and will locate the copies to a new location. Okay, but now none of the saved games work. Super Mario 64, Zelda Ocarina of Time, etc. Emulation feels faster.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
