Existing users, 
 CMYK Production + - 2.0.1normalize a batch of images to CMYK |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
All Feedback: 1 - 5 of 5
Amazing.... 
- Version: 2.0.1, 7/3/2008 03:55PM PST
carnagex2000
One of the best RGB to CMYK softwares out there, its simple to use and the results are better then what I can achieve in Photoshop. I picked it up the day after trying out the software, and im super happy with the results.
Very helpful - Version: 2.0, 8/2/2005 10:36AM PST
Thomas_Spitfire
I tried and bought.
First I tried Photo Perfect Digi Cam from the same company and it similar but no CMYK option but the images comes out very nice. The enhancment is really good.
Now I tried this CMYK Production software.
First I only used to convert images to my CMYK profiles and the result is better than in Photoshop. I do not understand how this software can do that??? It is simply more accurate to the RGB original. With the same ICC profile!!??
Then I discovered that this software had the same, or even better, features for enhancing the images before converting them to press, then the Photo Perfect.
So I can now trash my Photo Perfect. No big deal though, only 30-40 euro.
Anyway, good stuff.
And it is automatic. I have tried to create similar auto features in Photoshop but I cant get any consistancy in it. But this work.
Try for yourself.
First I tried Photo Perfect Digi Cam from the same company and it similar but no CMYK option but the images comes out very nice. The enhancment is really good.
Now I tried this CMYK Production software.
First I only used to convert images to my CMYK profiles and the result is better than in Photoshop. I do not understand how this software can do that??? It is simply more accurate to the RGB original. With the same ICC profile!!??
Then I discovered that this software had the same, or even better, features for enhancing the images before converting them to press, then the Photo Perfect.
So I can now trash my Photo Perfect. No big deal though, only 30-40 euro.
Anyway, good stuff.
And it is automatic. I have tried to create similar auto features in Photoshop but I cant get any consistancy in it. But this work.
Try for yourself.
I bought it after testing - Version: 2.0, 7/29/2005 08:35AM PST
Gotham City Mayor
I think it is really good. Not that I would trash Photoshop but not I can simple let this little software do the boring stuff.
I litterary went swimming with my kid when this software did a hole magazine for me (the prepress part).
I only touched a few images in Photoshop afterwards.
Impressive and the CMYK are much better than before.
I used my good old press profile but clicked "optmize profile" and now the yellow is clean etc.
Cool.
I litterary went swimming with my kid when this software did a hole magazine for me (the prepress part).
I only touched a few images in Photoshop afterwards.
Impressive and the CMYK are much better than before.
I used my good old press profile but clicked "optmize profile" and now the yellow is clean etc.
Cool.
No, not exactly like Photoshop... - Version: 1.0, 10/21/2004 02:25AM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
Hubb
That's what I thought at first, but this is not just about tagging profiles. It actually has an option to optimize the profiles, allowing for ink savings apparently or/and better cyan definition. I ran a few tests and although the "optimized" images appeared identical I could notice a marked difference in the plates.
*cough*Photoshop?*cough* - Version: 1.0, 10/20/2004 11:44AM PST
(1 of 2 users found this comment useful)
BEIGE
not to be a bummer but i have a Photoshop droplet on my desktop that does this. It's a program by Adobe - check it out some time.
Most Recent Replies: View All 4 Replies
- i take it back (2 replies)
