Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac OS X  |  Web & Software Development  |  Site Creation / Management  |  SEEdit

SEEdit

SEEdit - 2.5

XHTML editor

All Time: (3.0)
This Version: Not rated (0.0)
Current Version: 2.5
Release Date: 2005-05-08
License: Update
Downloads (this version): 1,850
Downloads (all versions): 6,054
Price: $24.95

Feedback Summary:

This Version:
Overall Rating: Not rated (0.0) Features: Not rated (0.0) Support: Not rated (0.0)
Ease of Use: Not rated (0.0) Quality / Stability: Not rated (0.0) Price: Not rated (0.0)
Add Your Feedback

Key to Types of Feedback:

ReviewsReviews   TroubleshootingTroubleshooting   Usage TipsUsage Tips   Developer NotesDeveloper Notes   CommentaryCommentary   Featured ReviewsFeatured Reviews

All Feedback: 1 - 5 of 5



SEEdit ReviewNeeds Help - Version: 2.0, 1/1/2005 08:31PM PST

(1 of 2 users found this comment useful)

MacHead
This app has some nice features but really needs some work on the help file or some cohesive documentation.

There are a lot of features in SEEdit but they go unexplained. The help file is nothing more than series of hints. There is an example file that highlights the main features but doesn't really explain using the program.

With some decent docs this might be a 5 star app, but for now it is just a app that may have potential if one really knew how to use it.
Post a commentAlert Admin

Most Recent Replies: View All 2 Replies

SEEdit CommentaryWhat is "good code"? - Version: 2.0 fc4, 9/27/2004 01:50AM PST

(3 of 3 users found this comment useful)

heinz1
Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote that SEEdit would not generate good code. I think that is not true. I spotted only one "incorrect" MIME type: in the XHTML 1.0 Basic Template of SEEdit, and one "half incorrect" MIME type in the XHTML 1.0 Frameset Template. See http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-xhtml-media-types-20020801/xhtml-media-types.html (especially the 3.5 Summary there) for better information on MIME types for XHTML,
SEEdit has an excellent support for validating XHTML via Tidy, which is included somehow in the program. But to be 100 % sure, anyone will have to rely on his/her own knowledge and understanding of the subject. Nobody's perfect.
I highly recommend SEEdit as a tool for making better websites, because it's so damn efficient, used either alone or together with other authoring software.
Heinz J. Malcharzyk
Post a commentAlert Admin

SEEdit ReviewExciting XHTML editor - Version: 2.0 fc4, 9/21/2004 11:32AM PST

(1 of 2 users found this comment useful)

leisi
This isn't just yet another editor:
  • it is a highly specialised Web Site Editor – not a general editor
  • it integrates with your tools (BBEdit, Style Master, CSSEdit)
    -- a humble, yet brilliant feature,
  • it creates sites not (just) pages, with folders for includes,
    media, scripts etc, and it remembers them afterwards
  • it helps thick heads put thing in order, both the site, the code,
    the css, your images -- with a built-in image center/database
  • especially: it uses your CSS file as a resource when you work
    with the HTML code
  • but ... SEEdit is just a tool (and not immune against dishonest
    reviews)
    --, valid code is your own responsability, though SEEdit
    helps you stay valid!
  • it includes a previewer -- and it is the closest a text editor
    comes a WYSIWYG editor
  • and there is more ...!

The language/unicode support is not complete yet, but the responsive developer
is working on it!


Try it, and get into it. You will be suprised how interesting and well thought out
the approach is.

Post a commentAlert Admin

SEEdit Developer NoteNote about "dosen't generate good code" - Version: 2.0 fc4, 9/20/2004 11:24PM PST

(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)

Sven_E_Olsson_724
Bjarne D Mathiesen from Copenhagen, have not answered
my two emails yeat. (Where generate SEEdit bad code?)

But here is an link about mime types:
http://www.xhtmlsoft.com/mime.html

Sven E
Developer of SEEdit
Post a commentAlert Admin

SEEdit Reviewdoesn't generate good code - Version: 2.0 fc4, 9/19/2004 12:56PM PST

(0 of 2 users found this comment useful)

BjarneDM
The author of this application doesn't understand the differecens between xhmtl 1.0 , xhtml 1.0 (html compatibel) and xhtml 1.1. Furthermore, the code produced can only be served as text/html instead of application/xhtml+xml - I've been unable to get Mozilla to accept the code generated as anything but text/html. Thus, this application generates code with all of the peculiarities that Ian Hickson warns against in his article: http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml .
Post a commentAlert Admin

Most Recent Replies: View All 2 Replies