zsDuplicateHunter - 2.3.0find and remove duplicate files |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
Why Bother? 



- Version: 2.2, 10/1/2005 08:08AM PST
(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)
Paul in Saudi
Great Simple but no Trash 



- Version: 2.13, 6/15/2005 03:28PM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
Whilich
You get 30 days to try this out. it works great and has a simple and intuitive interface.
The only thing I wish it had was a way to move things to the trash instead of "permanently delete" any duplicates.
Overall - Very Good!
The only thing I wish it had was a way to move things to the trash instead of "permanently delete" any duplicates.
Overall - Very Good!
Not quite finished? - Version: 2.13, 3/21/2005 09:47AM PST
Girls_Rule
I just downloaded and ran zsDuplicateHunter 2.13. I am using a dual 1 GHz G4, Mac OS X 10.3.8.
The program launched and immediately presented an error dialog. That window was far too wide for my screen (perhaps the developer has a 23" cinema display? I don't.)
"Error initializing help system.
javax.help.HelpSetException: Could not parse
Unknown PublicID -//Sun Microsystems Inc.//DTD JavaHelp HelpSet Version 2.0//EN
The parent tag for name cannot be helpset.
helpset cannot contain text main window.
Unbalanced tag name.
Got an IOException (null)
Parsing failed for jar:file:{path}/zsDuplicateHunter.app/Contents/Resources/Java/help.jar!/zsDuplicateHunter.hs"
The program seemed functional after that point, successfully located duplicates based on checksum (and quickly too) and moved them to the specified folder (recreating the folder path that they came from which is very nice) instead of deleting them. The dialog window warning me that files would be removed was also way to wide for my screen.
On the second launch the Java error dialog occurred again and was still way to wide for the screen. The files will be moved dialog was no longer to wide (which may only have been because the path and filename were shorter than the previously selected files?)
At launch and at exit I was reminded that the software is shareware and that I can purchase it. I like the feature set and might consider purchasing it but there is no way I will fork over my hard earned cash for unfinished, untested, unpolished software - not to this developer, not to Microsoft and not to Apple either. Just my 2¢.
The program launched and immediately presented an error dialog. That window was far too wide for my screen (perhaps the developer has a 23" cinema display? I don't.)
"Error initializing help system.
javax.help.HelpSetException: Could not parse
Unknown PublicID -//Sun Microsystems Inc.//DTD JavaHelp HelpSet Version 2.0//EN
The parent tag for name cannot be helpset.
helpset cannot contain text main window.
Unbalanced tag name.
Got an IOException (null)
Parsing failed for jar:file:{path}/zsDuplicateHunter.app/Contents/Resources/Java/help.jar!/zsDuplicateHunter.hs"
The program seemed functional after that point, successfully located duplicates based on checksum (and quickly too) and moved them to the specified folder (recreating the folder path that they came from which is very nice) instead of deleting them. The dialog window warning me that files would be removed was also way to wide for my screen.
On the second launch the Java error dialog occurred again and was still way to wide for the screen. The files will be moved dialog was no longer to wide (which may only have been because the path and filename were shorter than the previously selected files?)
At launch and at exit I was reminded that the software is shareware and that I can purchase it. I like the feature set and might consider purchasing it but there is no way I will fork over my hard earned cash for unfinished, untested, unpolished software - not to this developer, not to Microsoft and not to Apple either. Just my 2¢.
Trying to recover... 



- Version: 2.11, 1/25/2005 05:26PM PST
hEADcRASH
After scanning one of my terabyte drives, I was informed that there were over 19,000 duplicate files. After reading the documentation (as i am always a bit wary of "duplicate removers"), I was pleased to see that there were multiple levels of protection involved. I also set up a folder to move any "removed" duplicates to (instead of outright deleting them), just to double-check before actually trashing anything. The documentation also mentions being able to chose which duplicates to trash (for instance, the older version), but as I couldn't figure out how to specify it, I hoped that when I clicked the "remove duplicates" button I would be presented with a list of choices. In a flash, I lost nearly ALL of my files - hundreds of gigabytes worth. The only thing left on the drive were a file and a folder the program couldn't seem to delete. And the folder the program said it would use instead of the trash? Empty. The folder path in the preferences dialog box now shows a path deep within the bowels of the program. Perhaps Zizasoft has a business relationship with data recovery utilities? Data Rescue X is now scanning the drive, and it is going to be hours before I will know whether or not the files are recoverable.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- Trying to recover...
Great Software 



- Version: 2.11, 1/19/2005 04:42PM PST
Mark L. James
I have been using this software for three months and I found it a real godsend. I have tried the other competitive applications and found that this one wins hands down in accuracy, features and rapid response from the author.
This application is worth 2-3 times more than what they want for it and it has saved me countless MB and storage in managing my image libraries.
Thank you for a great job done!
This application is worth 2-3 times more than what they want for it and it has saved me countless MB and storage in managing my image libraries.
Thank you for a great job done!
Addition of other algorithms now makes this utility complete 



- Version: 2.10, 1/11/2005 10:17AM PST
Xiaopangzi
With this latest revision, zsDuplicateHunter has now become as perfectly reliable as is possible due to the addition of the 'comparison by digest' feature.
I no longer have many duplicates on my hard drive (thanks in part to zsDuplicateHunter), so I can't test the purportedly improved speed or see whether the crashes that I often had with broad searches of 'considerable numbers of files of various sizes' have been eliminated, especially when no filtering options are entered.
Although the checksum of a file remains unchanged when only a file name is changed, the checksum does change when only the metadata of a (music) file has changed, so you unfortunately still need to purchase a separate application for eliminating duplicate music files that have slightly varying id3 info embedded. Again, I recommend Omni Disk Sweeper for first locating and deleting the largest unneeded files on your computer.
I believe that zsDuplicateHunter is an essential utility for every Mac user, and I highly recommend it.
I no longer have many duplicates on my hard drive (thanks in part to zsDuplicateHunter), so I can't test the purportedly improved speed or see whether the crashes that I often had with broad searches of 'considerable numbers of files of various sizes' have been eliminated, especially when no filtering options are entered.
Although the checksum of a file remains unchanged when only a file name is changed, the checksum does change when only the metadata of a (music) file has changed, so you unfortunately still need to purchase a separate application for eliminating duplicate music files that have slightly varying id3 info embedded. Again, I recommend Omni Disk Sweeper for first locating and deleting the largest unneeded files on your computer.
I believe that zsDuplicateHunter is an essential utility for every Mac user, and I highly recommend it.
Checksum algorithms - Version: 2.01, 12/8/2004 11:32AM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
Xiaopangzi
Just as a followup, I'll mention that I was specifically referring to the MD5 algorithm that is more accurate but notably slower than CRC32—both of which are used by Apple Disk Utility—but the same is true also for SHA1 , SHA256 , SHA384 , and SHA512. Therefore, I hope that in future versions, Zizasoft will make it possible for zsDuplicateHunter to automatically switch to the MD5 or other algorithm whenever it encounters a file over a certain size threshold.
Scanning and comparison of ID3 (and older) metadata tags is such a different function than what zsDuplicateHunter does, so I don't know whether they'd consider adding that feature to a future version, but applications can and probably should have multifunctions when they fall within the same category (duplicate file elimination).
I would be interested to hear whether the developers used anything like OmniObjectMeter to ensure the best possible allocation of memory for what I assume is quite a memory intensive utility, but I'm not sure how useful it is for Java and other non-Cocoa apps. Anything to make this utility faster would be a great help, since it is inherently slow just by virtue of being a Java application.
Scanning and comparison of ID3 (and older) metadata tags is such a different function than what zsDuplicateHunter does, so I don't know whether they'd consider adding that feature to a future version, but applications can and probably should have multifunctions when they fall within the same category (duplicate file elimination).
I would be interested to hear whether the developers used anything like OmniObjectMeter to ensure the best possible allocation of memory for what I assume is quite a memory intensive utility, but I'm not sure how useful it is for Java and other non-Cocoa apps. Anything to make this utility faster would be a great help, since it is inherently slow just by virtue of being a Java application.
Checksum calculation makes this superior to other dup searchers 



- Version: 2.01, 12/8/2004 11:02AM PST
(1 of 2 users found this comment useful)
Xiaopangzi
zsDuplicateHunter is the only duplicate-searching/deleting utility that is worthwhile for general files (PDF, txt, doc, jpg, gif, etc.), and I would have spent three times what they are asking just to have it. Why am I so enthusiastic? Well, as far as I know, this is the only such software that calculates checksums to ensure that the files are indeed duplicates, even when the name or dates have been changed by saving the same unchanged data at a different time. It has saved me months—if not years—of comparing files, all within a couple of days, enabling me to delete several thousand files already.
Although Java applications are painfully slow, I am a fan of them as well as any apps written in JavaScript, because it enables Windows and Linux developers to produce something that can be used on a Mac, thus expanding our world of options without having to work hard to convert them to our superior OS and hardware.
Unfortunately, though, zsDuplicateHunter does not search metadata, so if you want to weed out your music collection for songs that are in different formats (mp3, m4a, etc.) or those for which the actual music is exactly the same but don't have the same metadata (difference of one or more characters in the Artist, Album, Year, Composer, Genre, etc. fields), you have to use a different application after first deleting exact duplicates out with zsDuplicateHunter in case you have more than one folder of the same music.
Zizasoft warns that their implementation of CRC32 is not entirely reliable for very large files (which I assume they mean to be over about 2 GB), but I've also discovered from my own experience that you'll find hundreds of very different mbox Mail.app mailboxes that obviously contain very different messages still share the same size and checksum for some reason. If they could use a different formula for calculating checksum, such as whatever I used to use on Unix (and whatever Apple Disk Utility uses), we could save the questionable large files for these slower but more accurate calculations, as I assume their use of CRC32 is faster than other options. They warn that Adler is not as accurate as even CRC32, so I wouldn't take a chance on that.
It's unfortunate that this application does not ignore System files in the way that it does for Windows users, but maybe they'll add that ability in a future function.
If they could also add the ability to display metadata in the results for music files, or more importantly to search based on metadata without having the file name, size, or checksum match, this would truly be an all-in-one duplicate-searching/deleting utility.
I would also recommend using OmniDiskSweeper to clear out the largest unused files that are not actual duplicates on your various volumes, as I assume that zsDuplicateHunter probably uses some disk space for temp files or virtual memory to store results.
Although Java applications are painfully slow, I am a fan of them as well as any apps written in JavaScript, because it enables Windows and Linux developers to produce something that can be used on a Mac, thus expanding our world of options without having to work hard to convert them to our superior OS and hardware.
Unfortunately, though, zsDuplicateHunter does not search metadata, so if you want to weed out your music collection for songs that are in different formats (mp3, m4a, etc.) or those for which the actual music is exactly the same but don't have the same metadata (difference of one or more characters in the Artist, Album, Year, Composer, Genre, etc. fields), you have to use a different application after first deleting exact duplicates out with zsDuplicateHunter in case you have more than one folder of the same music.
Zizasoft warns that their implementation of CRC32 is not entirely reliable for very large files (which I assume they mean to be over about 2 GB), but I've also discovered from my own experience that you'll find hundreds of very different mbox Mail.app mailboxes that obviously contain very different messages still share the same size and checksum for some reason. If they could use a different formula for calculating checksum, such as whatever I used to use on Unix (and whatever Apple Disk Utility uses), we could save the questionable large files for these slower but more accurate calculations, as I assume their use of CRC32 is faster than other options. They warn that Adler is not as accurate as even CRC32, so I wouldn't take a chance on that.
It's unfortunate that this application does not ignore System files in the way that it does for Windows users, but maybe they'll add that ability in a future function.
If they could also add the ability to display metadata in the results for music files, or more importantly to search based on metadata without having the file name, size, or checksum match, this would truly be an all-in-one duplicate-searching/deleting utility.
I would also recommend using OmniDiskSweeper to clear out the largest unused files that are not actual duplicates on your various volumes, as I assume that zsDuplicateHunter probably uses some disk space for temp files or virtual memory to store results.
RE: Yeah, but you MUST . . . - Version: 1.21, 11/4/2004 07:24AM PST
Mark_Noble_712
You can resize zsDuplicateHunter in standard Mac OS X fashion by grabbing the lower right corner and resizing. We will add the resize indicator to the next release to make this more obvious.
RE: In a word: knock-it-off. - Version: 1.21, 11/4/2004 07:19AM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
Mark_Noble_712
Please be aware that zsDuplicateHunter does allow free lifetime upgrades as do all products from Zizasoft. All licensed users are entitled to download new versions of zsDuplicateHunter as they are released. You can even check for updates from zsDuplicateHunter so are always assured to have the latest version.
As to pricing, we believe $19.95 is a fair price for zsDuplicateHunter based on the functionality provided. Yes there are cheaper products, there are also more significantly more expensive products in this category.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
It works, I guess. It is certainly not intuitive. But all in all, why bother? Spotlight identifies dupes pretty well and with everyone having a multi-meg hard drive why does it really matter to zap dupes.
I should not have bothered with it.