Audio Companion - 1.3.5sound recorder w/auto split & sound encoding |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
Automation at School of Music 



- Version: 1.1.8, 4/12/2006 06:58PM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
Royhinckley
I still prefer Audacity...and it's free! 



- Version: 1.0.9, 5/3/2005 07:26AM PST
(0 of 3 users found this comment useful)
midiw1Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- I still prefer Audacity...and it's free!
AHHHHHRRGGGG!! 



- Version: 1.0.8, 3/27/2005 10:08AM PST
(1 of 3 users found this comment useful)
Performa460Appart from that its allright, but better programs are avilable.
I use Audio Recorder, a simple but effective and free program.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
We are now using AC for all of the recordings at the University of Utah Gardner Hall. We use it because it is simpler and easier to script than ProTools or Logic. (Both of which we own and use in other labs.) We also use it for automated recordings.
We have it set up with five instances (copies) of one AC running on one machine, each routed to a different input stream from a 002 (and one routed to the line input). We have the automation set so it will record each hall or recital room (five total) whenever there is any signal. This means we basically record everything all the time in five spaces. So we have been running AC constantly, an average of 10 hours a day, 7 days a week, five concurrent copies for about six months. It has been extremely robust and reliable, with rare failures, yet simple and staightfoward for our application.