Process - 3.0.8Project management and outlining. |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
Curious omission? 



- Version: 3.0.8, 2/12/2009 07:37AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
vdeno1
Won't ever touch this again 



- Version: 3.0, 2/7/2008 12:00AM PST
(4 of 6 users found this comment useful)
dalizardDownloaded, and after no small amount of head-scratching, realised I had to use "Import" to open my previous 'processes'
Got them in, seemingly intact then tried to delete a project that was now finished.
Process 3 promptly quit.
Safari became unusable and eventually quit unexpectedly.
Mail.app did the same.
Followed by BBEdit.
None of the apps would re-launch without quitting until a restart.
Needless to say, I won't be touching Process again. Ever.
Won't ever touch this again 



- Version: 3.0, 2/7/2008 12:00AM PST
(1 of 3 users found this comment useful)
dalizardDownloaded, and after no small amount of head-scratching, realised I had to use "Import" to open my previous 'processes'
Got them in, seemingly intact then tried to delete a project that was now finished.
Process 3 promptly quit.
Safari became unusable and eventually quit unexpectedly.
Mail.app did the same.
Followed by BBEdit.
None of the apps would re-launch without quitting until a restart.
Needless to say, I won't be touching Process again. Ever.
A Concerned Purchaser - Version: 2.0.3, 12/19/2007 07:42PM PST
(3 of 3 users found this comment useful)
agua_dotmacFile saving should indeed be automatic. And I have on occasions experienced it NOT saving when quitting, myself. This induces a high degree of mistrust in the application... and such applications REALLY need rock-solid dependability!
File linking is inconsistent -- not from a bug perspective, but rather by design. The Process data files are in fact packages, and SOME file types indeed get "eaten" by Process, as they are moved into your data file's package. This is damned dangerous if you ask me. And, it's a little too aggressive o Process' part, thinking it can be-all and do-all as well as other dedicated applications. Process should simply utilize Finder aliases. This would make tracking of files that are moved, as well as being able to reference one file more than once within Process, easier. My Process data file is littered with broken links.
Unless I am not using it properly, the iCal integration is buggy. When I try to set a future iCal event as an alarm, Process puts it in on the DATE CREATED.
Also, you cannot fully search note contents; only "Item" (or event heading) text. This is a major problem, as -- at least as far as I can determine -- because a lot of data is "hidden" from Process' search function. I have many Items with the default not loaded with text. But, I can't search this text. Major problem.
Also, it would be great if, while being able to preview web pages within Process, an option to "Open page in default browser" would be highly welcome.
And yet, with all these problems, I have twice tried OmniOutliner... but have come back to Process. Process feels like a Mac application, whereas Omnioutliner feels like a Windows port. I really like its iCal integration... if I can get it to work properly.
Process is in dire need of a major revision and ironing-out of bugs. It's potential is serious.
OH! AND PLEASE JUMSOFT do NOT go the way of iCal/Leopard and eliminate the shelf. I absolutely HATE the way Apple changed iCal in this regard. WAY too many clicks/keystrokes to get editing on stuff.
Beware this company's Efforts - Version: 2.0.3, 11/22/2007 09:45AM PST
(2 of 4 users found this comment useful)
robulackThe company's support is dismal, and they permit well-known and documented bugs to exist in their products for long periods of time (i.e. Process went for almost a year without a single upgrade, despite their public acknowledgement that several of its key advertised features were non-functional).
This is a company that needs to take a step back and decide if they're all about quality or quantity. Currently, for them, it's quantity, and hence the quality of their products and their support system is very low.
Shows promise, bug extremely buggy and untrustworthy 



- Version: 2.0.2, 3/18/2007 01:22PM PST
(3 of 3 users found this comment useful)
robulackProcess is, in concept, a great app that well combines outlining with calendaring and document management. Unfortunately, it is broken in all three areas and, as a result, largely unusable.
First, in outlining mode, there are serioues flaws that prevent a user from re-ordering and structuring existing items in an outline. Additionally, when creating new outline items, they often do not arrive in an outline where one would expect. This makes sorting a task list very frustrating and, ultimately, unsuccessful.
Regarding its calendar capabilities, Process does not manage its relationship with iCal effectively. It "pushes" new calendars and events to iCal well enough, but typically cannot handle any changes that occur to a Process-published calendar in iCal. Changing events on these calendars in iCal makes Process crash. Furthermore, rather than integrating with a pre-existing iCal calendar with a name identical to a Process project, Process will create a second iCal calendar with the same name, and this causes all sorts of problems with both Process and iCal.
Finally, in regards to documents, yes, as previous users have posted, it has a bad habit of eating Word files. However, another concern I have is the way that it manages a project's relationship with its files. If you fill up a project with files, they are to the existing, external documents, so if you move your Process file, the links become broken.
Process, in its current state, is like a proof of concept. Well, I like the concept, but it needs a lot of work to prove that it's ready for every day use.
Has potential, but cannot recommend now - Version: 2.0.2, 11/7/2006 03:50PM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
tlmurray--2008I hate to say it, but it seems another Macintosh developer has gone out and gotten a "real" job and left what could be a great program to languish. Jumsoft, if you read this, please donate your code to open source or sell it off, if you won't support it. Granted I don't expect a version 3 in November with 2.0.2 released in July, but multiple crash reports and many e-mails with issues that *break data* should be met with some kind of response.
This is not an expensive program, but nonetheless, I've wasted my money.
Has potential, but severely lacking 



- Version: 2.0.2, 10/20/2006 07:31AM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
OfficeRockerDON'T BUY UNTIL THE DEVELOPER STEPS UP TO THE PLATE AND IMPROVES THIS SOFTWARE.
Don't buy it 



- Version: 2.0.2, 9/23/2006 12:18PM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
MainziFor ex Process doesn't save proper your notes.
Big Warning! 



- Version: 2.0.2, 9/4/2006 02:23AM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
TomasBAs precious people have noted, the support is non-existent. Do not buy this software! Don't get fooled by the nice appearance, it will eat up all your data. This is afla quality software and should never have been sold in the first place.
I have not had a problem with ical integration [this is not an essential task for me, so heavy users may find more problems?]. The UI is great and looks not only like a Mac program but gives you a sense of the progression of a given project. I particularly like that each entry can have a set of notes for itself and that I can link to other programs--Notetaker for instance--click the link and it will immediately go to the right page of the notebook.
The downside--you can not print your notes!!!!!!!! I have been using process to keep notes for courses--nothing heavy like serious course prep--mostly just day to day items and questions for directed readings with students. those are stuck in the program unless I export them to html or copy and paste into another program. Yikes! the notes need to come out. I have contacted the developer [they promptly responded] and they have added printing as a feature request. Whatever would make some think that printing is optional??
For very heavy users--this would be a no-go. For me, I am going to look around for another similar program and keep eye on this one. But given that other reviewers have lost material, that gives me even more pause.