Existing users, 
 Iceberg - 1.2.7Tool for creating packages & metapackages. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
All Feedback: 1 - 9 of 9
Missing command-line interface - Version: 1.2.4, 10/23/2008 05:56AM PST
Devoyer
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- Missing command-line interface
Just What I Needed 
- Version: 1.2.2, 11/3/2006 05:56PM PST
schneb`
Except for a time where I was getting "Nothing to install" errors (which was fixed by just starting from scratch), this application made a complex task within reach of the novice developer (such as myself). Well done!
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
Probs under OSX 10.4.8? - Version: 1.2.2, 10/17/2006 06:42AM PST
eric.ramazzotti
Seems this no longer works under OS X 10.4.8
Anyone else seeing this. I'm working on an Intel based iMac
Anyone else seeing this. I'm working on an Intel based iMac
Most Recent Replies: View All 3 Replies
wow...nice update...but... - Version: 1.2, 6/17/2006 12:25PM PST
poolmouse
...we're still not able to add invisible files. :(
don montalvo, nyc
curmudgeon at large
don montalvo, nyc
curmudgeon at large
Most Recent Replies: View All 3 Replies
A real time saver - Version: 1.1.3, 2/21/2005 05:14AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
Rorqual
Compared to PackageMaker, that is. And with more functionality. And a much better interface. And a price which can't be beaten. If it didn't already exist, it would have to be invented :)
WOW! This is an awesome app! - Version: 1.1.3, 2/13/2005 07:04AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
Matt_Bendiksen_692
After struggling for a while using PackageMaker to build my installer packages, I decided to look for a commercial product that would easily let me automate the package building process. I came across Iceberg and decided to give it a try. WOW! This is an awesome professional quality application. It does so much more than PackageMaker and has a strong intuitive UI. Using it you can easily setup your project and use the CLI ("freeze") to automate the package building process.
The support is also terrific. Stéphane turned around a custom change request I had within a few days.
Don't let the fact that the application is free fool you. I've paid quite a bit of money for professional software that doesn't work nearly as good as IceBerg. Kudos to Stéphane and thanks again for developing such a great app!
The support is also terrific. Stéphane turned around a custom change request I had within a few days.
Don't let the fact that the application is free fool you. I've paid quite a bit of money for professional software that doesn't work nearly as good as IceBerg. Kudos to Stéphane and thanks again for developing such a great app!
Bravo! - Version: 1.1.2, 11/9/2004 07:43AM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
EdtheMacDyer
I continue to use Iceberg for all my packaging needs. This application is excellent.
Wonderful - Version: 1.1, 7/31/2004 02:37PM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
propaganda prod
This is brilliant, top-notch work. Infinitely more usable than Apple's PackageMaker. Merci beaucoup, Stéphane! I would gladly pay for this. You should at least consider putting a PayPal link on your site to accept donations.
Is a fantastic - Version: 1.0.2, 4/17/2004 04:58PM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
Perbix
alternative to using packagemaker that comes with the developers tools. I set up both the exact same way...and packagemaker always gives me a bad package, where Iceberg using hte same information and options makes a workable package. I have no idea what Packagemaker is doing that I did not do, but it works for me.
Just one thing I'm missing badly - command-line interface to build the package would really be helpful. We have the extensive and complex build system which does all the job to build applications, utilities, preprocess and build help, resources and so on. And in the end I have to build the package manually :(