SiteSucker - 2.2.4Download Web sites automatically for offline viewing. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
It does the job 



- Version: 2.2.4, 3/16/2009 08:17AM PST
Leemac
I've used SiteSucker for over a year and unless the website has blocked it, it's worked without flaw. There have been times I've had to "hack" the site, but SiteSucker does it's job unless I fail to do mine. Great application!
Best of Bunch 



- Version: 2.2.4, 3/15/2009 09:52PM PST
Simmonet
Tried / used them all.
Sitesucker is the one I keep coming back to because it simply works!
No issues, problems or concerns.
Keep up the good work!
Sitesucker is the one I keep coming back to because it simply works!
No issues, problems or concerns.
Keep up the good work!
simply does not work - Version: 2.2.3, 2/6/2009 07:28PM PST
thestuntman
when this first arrived on the scene years ago, i was in love with it. i fired it up and sucked down hundreds of sites without a hitch... and that's even without adjusting any of the handful of configuration options. and then they added features to it... more and more configuration options. soon it just simply did not work anymore. not at all. not on any site. ever. i have spent hours and hours trying every possible combination of every setting and i get nothing but an index page from any site i try. i keep giving up, and then coming back, only to be angry, frustrated, and hopeless all over again.
Most Recent Replies: View All 2 Replies
- simply does not work