Existing users, 
 Aquastrings - 1.0Cocoa GUI for 'strings' |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: |   (4.0) |
Features: | (4.0) |
Support: | (4.0) |
| Ease of Use: | (5.0) |
Quality / Stability: | (4.0) |
Price: | (5.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
This spreads around the joy - Version: 1.0, 1/19/2004 08:14PM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
wgscott
Terminal - Version: 1.0, 1/19/2004 05:08PM PST
(3 of 3 users found this comment useful)
blueskyis_dotmac
I wonder what percentage of Mac users are familiar with Terminal. I see so many comments of "so what, it's just a wrapper for an app you can use in terminal". Maybe we should remove the Mac GUI entirely since we can do it all in Terminal?
What's the point? - Version: 1.0, 1/19/2004 04:19PM PST
(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)
Eridius
What's the point of this? It's just as easy to use strings in the terminal.
And I'm mildly surprised. You should have put some interesting string constants into Aquastrings for those of us poking at the Aquastrings application itself! :P
And I'm mildly surprised. You should have put some interesting string constants into Aquastrings for those of us poking at the Aquastrings application itself! :P
One of the most enjoyable things to do with the unix strings command is to look at microsoft word files that people send you. Often, there is more than meets the eye, and strings reveals content that the sender sometimes things is no longer there, and can be quite embarrassing. Whenever someone sends me a word document as an attachment, I run strings on it, and about 20% of the time I find some hidden text and quote it and email it back.