Existing users, 
 Scrawlers - 1.1online Pictionary style game |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
Great game! 
- Version: 1.1, 2/6/2004 06:20PM PST
brossow
Agree with a couple of Atin's points below. PLEASE end the game early if everyone has guessed correctly and/or if all points are gone. Also, the vocab IS limited and should be increased. But as for the "don't allow people not to scrawl" ... I think Atin may have missed the fact that scrawlers are awarded points as well as those who choose not to scrawl, perhaps moreso; I don't usually choose to scrawl because I'm usually playing this on my couch on my laptop, and scrawling with the trackpad is difficult for me. But for a great, free game I can't complain too loudly or bitterly. THANKS!
This is an excellent programme - - Version: 1.0, 1/27/2004 11:53AM PST
Atin
It's very simple, but therein lies its beauty.
May I make to suggestions for the developer
Firstly, please enable a a quick end to the game when all players have guessed the word.
Secondly, please do not allow players not to scrawl - this ruins the points system and generally undermines the purpose of the game as I see it.
Thirdly, and most importantly, - Please increase the vocabulary of the game. I haven't played it many times but I have already seen many repeats of words and expressions
I would also be grateful if you removed the USA centric expressions such as 'boogers' and strange spellings of words such in "american" - why not use internationally recognisable words?
But keep up the good work anyway
Cool game! - Version: 1.0, 1/25/2004 07:50AM PST
Tassilo Rau
Really a lot fun, espescially with four or more people playing. But the words repeat far too often, much more are needed (and shouldnt be too hard to implement). Also the CPU usage is _insane_, close to 100%. Five stars minus one for lacking words and CPU usage. Add/fix those and it's brilliant.
