Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac OS X  |  Design / Graphics  |  Other Design / Graphics  |  DeIMG

DeIMG

DeIMG - 4.0

turns images into HTML tables

All Time: (4.8)
This Version: Not rated (0.0)
Current Version: 4.0
Release Date: 2008-02-20
License: Freeware
Downloads (this version): 2,087
Downloads (all versions): 9,394
Price: Freeware

Feedback Summary:

This Version:
Overall Rating: Not rated (0.0) Features: Not rated (0.0) Support: Not rated (0.0)
Ease of Use: Not rated (0.0) Quality / Stability: Not rated (0.0) Price: Not rated (0.0)
Add Your Feedback

Key to Types of Feedback:

ReviewsReviews   TroubleshootingTroubleshooting   Usage TipsUsage Tips   Developer NotesDeveloper Notes   CommentaryCommentary   Featured ReviewsFeatured Reviews

All Feedback: 1 - 10 of 27 |  1 2 3 Next



DeIMG ReviewPleasing and awesome - Version: 3.1u, 12/24/2007 08:00AM PST

bernie6
This goes into the category of programming that I call "gift" or just "love for the world." Thanks to the author for placing this into the world. Personally I love it.
Post a commentAlert Admin

DeIMG Usage TipWorth a try - Version: 3.1, 11/5/2005 08:28AM PST

Enricof
I can think of two possible uses.
- Convert complex page structure from vectorial drawing to tables, but I don't know the quality of the code. You could "draw" a page instead than input numbers and numbers in the code
- with email, where a table appears immediately on opening the email, while an image has to be loaded afterward. But I fear this could change a light email in a heavy one...

Well, worth a try for me...
Post a commentAlert Admin

DeIMG ReviewI laughed, I cried, I anointed my body with scented oils. - Version: 3.1, 11/5/2005 05:07AM PST

(4 of 4 users found this comment useful)

bjornnitmo
This program sets new standards in the unbelievably cool and unbelievably pointless categories. The author should be commended and then beaten. I recommend That's Not a Picture wholeheartedly. To whom however, I have no idea.
Post a commentAlert Admin

DeIMG CommentaryActually has a possible use - Version: 3.0, 10/10/2005 12:33PM PST

(3 of 5 users found this comment useful)

jimsnider67
This has a possible use in a situation where you need to display a really small logo on a page on a secure server that's apart from your own server and you don't have a secure server of your own to send an actual image from. This fat bunch of HTML won't cause a pop-up that says that there are non-secure items on the page when a visitor goes from your site to the secure one (like if you have a PayPal link on your site.

Just a possible use. I might try it out for this very purpose. Damn web host wants extra money for a secure server.
Post a commentAlert Admin

Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies

DeIMG CommentaryIt's a novel idea... - Version: 3.0, 4/8/2005 09:16AM PST

(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)

DavidRavenMoon
But it produces extremely large HTML files that take forever to load, even off your hard drive. I can't imaging how long it would take to download them from the internet! But still, I think it might be useful for something.
Post a commentAlert Admin

DeIMG ReviewGREAT IDEA! - Version: 2.2, 11/18/2004 12:38AM PST

(1 of 3 users found this comment useful)

Fred_Leonard
This is a great program!

It doesn't work well for large images because the browser loads it really slow, but for small logos, and perhaps email signatures, it's a great idea!

Post a commentAlert Admin

DeIMG CommentarySure Is Interesting, but - Version: 2.2, 11/17/2004 07:39PM PST

telem
Safari and Camino seem to take a really long time trying to digest THAP's output.
Post a commentAlert Admin

DeIMG CommentaryWhy? - Version: 2.2, 11/17/2004 05:08PM PST

(4 of 5 users found this comment useful)

*moremasters*
I'll tell you why - because you can!
This is a marvelous bit of fun that turns a few-kb image into a tens of megabytes html document seemingly just for a laugh.
I think if people are wondering about why or in what situation you'd use this software then IMHO they're completely missing the point! :)
Why? Why not!
(My apologies to the developer if this was intended as a serious exercise, otherwise it's great to see people doing something completely barmy just for the hell of it now and again I reckon)
Post a commentAlert Admin

DeIMG CommentaryNovel... - Version: 2.2, 11/17/2004 05:01PM PST

(2 of 3 users found this comment useful)

SnyperM
While obviously not...really useful or practical. This is a pretty novel idea. A lot of the bloat could easily be reduced by using css to set al the table cells to 1px x1px with a few lines of code rather than setting it via an attribute per cell. Furthermore you could work up some algorithm to use css to color any red cell red, any green cell green, etc. Although at that point you're kind of reinventing the wheel.

in any event, this isn't an app I ever would have thought of doing...
Post a commentAlert Admin

DeIMG Usage TipA good reason! - Version: 2.2, 11/17/2004 04:56PM PST

(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)

SlyMac
I can see one great reason for using this app. Most HTML capable email clients are set by default to not view images unless you accept them - with this program you can have your logo (or graphic Sig) at the foot of your message and have the receiver see it without the little missing graphic icons... So there, one good reason!
Post a commentAlert Admin