Creative Project Manager - 8.4.05project management software |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
Seen this tactic before! - Version: 8.35, 9/25/2006 07:47PM PST
(3 of 4 users found this comment useful)
jeffsters1
Sign in for screenshot? - Version: 8.35, 9/25/2006 08:46AM PST
(4 of 4 users found this comment useful)
cocoaNut
Fails the Easy Access Test - Version: 8.15, 2/11/2006 10:57AM PST
(6 of 7 users found this comment useful)
freevito
Do they want customers? - Version: 7.7, 7/6/2005 07:56PM PST
(4 of 5 users found this comment useful)
gbest_dotmac
A Great Choice for a Focused Firm 



- Version: 7.4.5, 1/20/2005 08:57AM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
envanoMost Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- Hmmm... I wonder where this reviewer works
Workflow is Great - Version: 7.4, 12/21/2004 08:08AM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
s.Dorst
You must be joking... - Version: 7.3.1, 10/27/2004 03:47PM PST
(2 of 3 users found this comment useful)
DigiPost
Not interested in filling out a form - Version: 7.1, 8/18/2004 04:44AM PST
(3 of 3 users found this comment useful)
Somynona
Censorship is no way to gain customers - Version: 7.1, 8/17/2004 07:47PM PST
(5 of 5 users found this comment useful)
designprofThe fact that my remarks no longer exist is evidence of manipulative and unfair censorship that defeats the purpose of this site's Feedback feature, period. I rely on the feedback posted on this site to make critical purchasing decisions all the time, and I dare say that most others do as well. To filter responses that contain neither foul or profain language, nor any slandarous or defamatory remarks towards the company is quite childish and smacks in the face of the First Amendment.
I see, however, that a lone company rebuttle still stands below. That, my friends, sends shivers up my spine. They get to defend what has been posted thusfar, while deleting those posts that they deem not worthy. This was the U.S.A. the last time I checked. Has pointed criticism gone out the window along with freedom of expression, i.e. speech in this case?
(I wonder... is this the way eBay and Amazon conduct business too? I know they delete off-colored posts, but targeted censorship? Please.)
My advice to the company management/marketing staff for this product is simple: Your product is far from perfect. If you think otherwise, than you are stubborn and quite egotistical. Rather than censoring criticism, why not respond to posts you feel are in error with point-by-point rebuttals.
I, for one, am sick and tired of every product on the planet being "the best" or "number 1" and propped up on a pedestal so high it sounds like there is no other alternative on the market. It's pure manipulation, and it's as as illegal as subliminal ads were in the 1960's.
Is there no such thing as humility anymore.
Products are improved when they are built on both refined successes and corrected failures. To believe anything less is ignorrant of reality.
quick feedback - Version: 7.0, 8/5/2004 11:55AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
sturtusProbably won't go with this product because it's remotely hosted, we deal with motion graphics files that are huge and a T1 line is a huge bottleneck for us to upload HD MPEG4 compressed files all day for multiple simultaneous jobs. No thanks.
Run away!