Existing users, 
 Calculator II - 1.0Performs arithmetic, probability & trigonometric functions. |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: |   (3.0) |
Features: | (3.5) |
Support: | (3.5) |
| Ease of Use: | (3.5) |
Quality / Stability: | (4.0) |
Price: | (5.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
Probability? Not likely - Version: 1.0, 5/22/2004 03:48PM PST
TGD
Saying this calculator has probability functions is like saying a pencil has probability functions. It will do it, if you're willing to work it out for yourself.
Lack of Keypad Support - Version: 1.0, 8/4/2003 11:26PM PST
John Date
I use a Powerbook G4 and a Kensington Mobile keypad, and can't, for the life of me, get this calculator to respond to the enter button. Additionally, once the attempt is made to use the keypad, Enter and Return on my PBook's keyboard no longer works. Using 10.2.6 and up-to-date drivers (use my keypad 10 hours a day).
Other than this and the aforementioned issues, I do like the drawers implementation (all the advanced parts stay together as one when dragging the app around), as well as the clean look and great button org.
Other than this and the aforementioned issues, I do like the drawers implementation (all the advanced parts stay together as one when dragging the app around), as well as the clean look and great button org.
Terrible results! - Version: 1.0, 7/27/2003 02:01PM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
davidc
OK, explain how, with 12-decimal precision, when I type 1.1, I get 1.100000001490.
If you then subtract 0.100000001490, you SHOULD get 1.000000000000, but instead, you'll get 0.99999998510, which isn't even CLOSE to 1.000000000000 in 12-decimal precision.
Although the interface is nice and the potential is there, the actual results make this worthless for precision answers.
If you then subtract 0.100000001490, you SHOULD get 1.000000000000, but instead, you'll get 0.99999998510, which isn't even CLOSE to 1.000000000000 in 12-decimal precision.
Although the interface is nice and the potential is there, the actual results make this worthless for precision answers.
