Existing users, 
 Iconizer Pro X - 3.0.6make icons from images for folder backgrounds |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
All Feedback: 1 - 5 of 5
That doesnt make sense - Version: 2.0.9, 6/1/2004 06:11AM PST
(5 of 6 users found this comment useful)
Freelance Web Development
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- That doesnt make sense
Panther support finally 
- Version: 1.9.8, 11/29/2003 10:44PM PST
(3 of 4 users found this comment useful)
umpaLoompa
This is a nice app for those times you want a pic in X folders but do not want to add a hidden pic file for the background. No hidden pics here. works nice for that usage.
I don't see the point - Version: 1.9.6, 10/29/2003 08:02AM PST
(4 of 7 users found this comment useful)
Stormchild
This isn't an OS 9 product. It solves a problem that only exists in OS 9. It's therefore pointless. Who cares if some people still need OS 9? No one "needs" pretty pictures in their folders, so that's a ridiculous argument. This product is for OS X, and its results are vastly inferior to just using the built-in ability of OS X to put a picture in a folder. Seems obviously pointless to me.
Still useful - Version: 1.9.5, 10/12/2003 05:05PM PST
(4 of 6 users found this comment useful)
FrakenSTINE
I still find folder pics useful because you don't have to include a photo in the folder (with OS X). Still a useful process for my needs.
What's the point? - Version: 1.8.2, 6/21/2003 09:01PM PST
(2 of 4 users found this comment useful)
tonton--2008
Unless you're developing for 9 (and who's still doing THAT?) why do you need this? OS X can use pictures as folder backgrounds.
These look cool, until the window is resized, or you touch an icon. The hidden image 'official' way is better.
Maybe this program should just create the hidden jpg file, place it in the folder, and set the folder's properties to display it. That would save some work.