Existing users, 
 Self-Combust - 1.0self-combusting program, just for fun |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Information Related to Version:
Broken Link? Newer Version? Tell us!
Product Description:
Self-Combust is a Macintosh OS X application that does exactly what its name suggests. It's supposed to be funny, but it's probably not. At least it's free.
Operating System Requirements:
This product is designed to run on the following operating systems:
- Mac OS X 10.2
Additional Requirements:
- Mac OS X 10.2 or higher
Screenshots:
Download Links:
Download Self-Combust Now (File Size: 4.5M)
Your Installed Versions:
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: |   (1.0) |
Features: | (1.0) |
Support: | (3.0) |
| Ease of Use: | (1.0) |
Quality / Stability: | (1.0) |
Price: | (1.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
One Star Off My Zero Star Rating - Version: 1.0, 11/2/2003 12:18AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
Djela
It should have both self combusted AND hosed my system. A combination like this could send the designer back for years of new product development.
Absolutely the WORST, ahem - per author request! - Version: 1.0, 6/9/2003 12:45PM PST
(4 of 4 users found this comment useful)
Jakimo
graffix - you're going to ruin the author's goal giving this app high ratings! hehe, check out what he writes on his website:
Finally, a good question. I wrote this program with the hopes that I might be able to receive the lowest-ever rating for a program from MacAddict. The Letters section of the July 2003 issue of MacAddict has a letter asking why the "zero-widget" rating has never been used. The reply to this question from the editors explained that nothing had yet been encountered that was worthy of such a low rating. To earn it, such a program "would have to hose our system, self-combust, or make some other grandiose mess to warrant such an honor." I decided to opt for the second option: self-combusting. I don't even know if the editors at MacAddict will even look at it, but I do hope this program is worthy of such a horrendously low rating.
No big deal, the last question in his FAQ finally made me laugh.. ! :)
Finally, a good question. I wrote this program with the hopes that I might be able to receive the lowest-ever rating for a program from MacAddict. The Letters section of the July 2003 issue of MacAddict has a letter asking why the "zero-widget" rating has never been used. The reply to this question from the editors explained that nothing had yet been encountered that was worthy of such a low rating. To earn it, such a program "would have to hose our system, self-combust, or make some other grandiose mess to warrant such an honor." I decided to opt for the second option: self-combusting. I don't even know if the editors at MacAddict will even look at it, but I do hope this program is worthy of such a horrendously low rating.
No big deal, the last question in his FAQ finally made me laugh.. ! :)
Oneear sez - Version: 1.0, 6/9/2003 10:49AM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
oneear
Worst program ever written. Doesn't even really selfcombust, user is forced to click two buttons and if you use gasoline it is not "self" combustion. It's not even self immulation as the user has to light the match. I hope Mac Addict gives this the worst rating ever received by any program.
