Existing users, 
 WuffCam - 1.5Webcam software |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
All Feedback: 1 - 3 of 3
Not bad - Version: 1.2, 10/10/2003 07:19AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
Symphonitron
This is my first webcam, so I have no real basis of comparison. I'm using v. 1.2 with iSight on OS 10.2.8 and it works fine. I can put the time (digitally) in a small embedded window using Widgets. I had to use a small article in MacAddict to help me understand the setup, however. The FTP wouldn't work with one of my web sites because that site requires an @ mark in the username, and WuffCam uses the @ mark to differentiate between the username/password and the site URL, which I think confused it. Fortunately I have another web site that works without the @. Nevertheless, WuffCam ought to have a wizard setup for us beginners.
Is this soft... - Version: 1.2, 7/20/2003 10:06AM PST
Jo Spock
iSight compatible ? TIA ;)
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- Is this soft...
Pretty good but missing some key features... 
- Version: 1.0.0.beta, 5/13/2003 02:04PM PST
Pentium Bunny
Not entirely unexpected at this revision level but great interface and has some nice additions not available with Evocam or Oculus. I'll buy when wuff has ability to support weather badges and imbedded clock etc. A fixed target file size would be greatly appreciated. Otherwise very nice.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
