Existing users, 
 WebCopier - 4.1.5download web sites and view them offline |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
All Feedback: 1 - 5 of 5
What - Version: 4.1, 6/6/2008 03:50PM PST
topherchris8530
Ok. You DON'T NEED TO GET THIS. you can do this for FREE on safari already. just click file save as and tada it's on your desktop. or wherever you save files to.
Interface Isn't Beautiful... 
- Version: 1.2, 6/28/2004 08:32PM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
dweingart
but, I found its ease of use to be surprisingly good. I was trying to make a static backup of a dynamic site of mine, and I tried all the major OSX site downloading programs, and this one did the most complete job. It was also faster than some of the other programs I tried.
The only thing it missed was a stylesheet that used @import instead of a link tag.
If I find that I need to perform this task more frequently in the future, I would definitely purchase the product. For the Mac market, they would probably do well to invest in some wizzy icons.
The only thing it missed was a stylesheet that used @import instead of a link tag.
If I find that I need to perform this task more frequently in the future, I would definitely purchase the product. For the Mac market, they would probably do well to invest in some wizzy icons.
One thing reviewers are overlooking - Version: 1.2, 5/10/2004 02:57PM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
mike666
Does this software have a bad interface? As a Windows port it is absolutely hideous and suffers from all the flaws inherent in such a piece.
Is this software overpriced? IMHO, yes, for its current state of development.
BUT: this software has very flexible options and does one thing that none of the wget wrappers out there (and no other Mac software that I could find, correct me if I'm wrong) will do. This app is a gem because it will analyse java and pull out media that is hiding behind java pop-up windows or any other scripts. It's not perfect, however, and seemed to miss a file or two from quite a few directories of the site I tested. Right now I'd consider paying $10-15US for it but would pay the $30 if the interface was de-uglified and I didn't have to finish its job for it.
Is this software overpriced? IMHO, yes, for its current state of development.
BUT: this software has very flexible options and does one thing that none of the wget wrappers out there (and no other Mac software that I could find, correct me if I'm wrong) will do. This app is a gem because it will analyse java and pull out media that is hiding behind java pop-up windows or any other scripts. It's not perfect, however, and seemed to miss a file or two from quite a few directories of the site I tested. Right now I'd consider paying $10-15US for it but would pay the $30 if the interface was de-uglified and I didn't have to finish its job for it.
lol... $30 - Version: 1.1, 6/10/2003 01:16AM PST
(2 of 4 users found this comment useful)
cyberfly
*g* i use sitesucker - its 4 free and makes a god job...
Bad installiation, terrible… - Version: 1.0, 4/6/2003 11:30AM PST
(1 of 3 users found this comment useful)
Typhoon
interface, overpriced.
