Existing users, 
 DJ-1800 - 1.0b4Complete MP3 DJ solution |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| Version 1.0b4: | |||||
| Overall Rating: |  (4.7) |
Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
Check out the base spec - Version: 2.2.1, 2/9/2006 08:51AM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
Dave_Addey_879
Even 2.2.1 has performance problems 
- Version: 2.2.1, 1/6/2006 08:43AM PST
Mikis--2008
DJ-1800 is a somewhat nice application, but have perfomance problems as do competitor Disco. Both DJ-1800 2.2.1 and Disco 2.8.9 gave Audio dropouts both when I loaded the second track to play and in Disco also when I momentarily switched applications. How's that for a nice first encounter? This was on a 400Mhz Powerbook G4 that otherwise run Traktor DJ Studio 2.6.2 as well as Traktor Beatport 1.0 very well. In addition Traktor *sounds better*. It has its own audio engine which helps. AFAIK both Disco and DJ-1800 rely on Quicktime. I have QT 7 on Mac OS X 10.3.9
Both Disco and DJ-1800 should be compared to the free Traktor Beatport application (you'll need to register, which is free) as well as the professional Traktor Dj Studio suite. Both Traktor versions outperforms DJ-1800, though DJ-1800 have more features. I haven't tried Traktor Beatport on G3 hardware though, nor have I tried Traktor DJ Studio 3.
Even the free Traktor Beatport have keyboard shortcuts, which really helps. Where are these in Disco and DJ-1800? Big plus for Hardware support in DJ-1800 though!!!
DJ-1800 has a few pluses over Disco as you can precue in many decks (Traktor Beatport also only have 2 decks) and better performance IMHO even on older hardware. But in an audio application, audio dropouts are unforgiveable. This Traktor DJ Studio also had before version 2.6 and I told them the same thing back then. Native Instruments listened. Traktor rules!
If you can't afford the real Traktor, even second hand, do yourself a favour and check out Traktor Beatport as well as the alternatives. Use what works for you! For G3 hardware DJ-1800 may work best, but on a G4 Traktor Beatport should convince. There are also a number of new features in DJ-1800 2.2.x that may tip the scale for you, so make sure you check them all before you decide.
Real-time apps are hard work, but if you can't outcreate a free application you might as well develop something else. I suggest both developers (of Disco and DJ-1800) try and improve their apps beyond Traktor Beatport. It sets a standard any DJ app should meet or exceed. Right now, it seems DJ-1800 could very well do that in a future incarnation. But the audio dropouts just have to go. It'd be better to have the interface freeze rather than the music.
Both Disco and DJ-1800 should be compared to the free Traktor Beatport application (you'll need to register, which is free) as well as the professional Traktor Dj Studio suite. Both Traktor versions outperforms DJ-1800, though DJ-1800 have more features. I haven't tried Traktor Beatport on G3 hardware though, nor have I tried Traktor DJ Studio 3.
Even the free Traktor Beatport have keyboard shortcuts, which really helps. Where are these in Disco and DJ-1800? Big plus for Hardware support in DJ-1800 though!!!
DJ-1800 has a few pluses over Disco as you can precue in many decks (Traktor Beatport also only have 2 decks) and better performance IMHO even on older hardware. But in an audio application, audio dropouts are unforgiveable. This Traktor DJ Studio also had before version 2.6 and I told them the same thing back then. Native Instruments listened. Traktor rules!
If you can't afford the real Traktor, even second hand, do yourself a favour and check out Traktor Beatport as well as the alternatives. Use what works for you! For G3 hardware DJ-1800 may work best, but on a G4 Traktor Beatport should convince. There are also a number of new features in DJ-1800 2.2.x that may tip the scale for you, so make sure you check them all before you decide.
Real-time apps are hard work, but if you can't outcreate a free application you might as well develop something else. I suggest both developers (of Disco and DJ-1800) try and improve their apps beyond Traktor Beatport. It sets a standard any DJ app should meet or exceed. Right now, it seems DJ-1800 could very well do that in a future incarnation. But the audio dropouts just have to go. It'd be better to have the interface freeze rather than the music.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- Even 2.2.1 has performance problems
Could be awesome - Version: 2.2.1, 12/9/2005 05:25PM PST
BradGoop
The interface is fantastic and I agree that this could be just what we DJ's need. However it is either incompatible with Tiger or doesn't like AIFF files or both.
Have had to force-quit the demo at every launch and it hangs on importing my uncompressed (non-MP3) audio files.
Haven't really tried it with MP3's as I need full format support.
Keep coding though, it will be great when stable!
Have had to force-quit the demo at every launch and it hangs on importing my uncompressed (non-MP3) audio files.
Haven't really tried it with MP3's as I need full format support.
Keep coding though, it will be great when stable!
Just wanted to say, the base recommended spec for DJ-1800 2.2.1 is an 800Mhz G3, G4 or G5 or better with at least 256Mhz memory, so it's not too surprising that you might have problems with a 400Mhz computer :-)
BTW, v2.2 of DJ-1800 did indeed include some serious audio stability improvements, which mean that audio dropouts are a thing of the past in DJ-1800 when using a machine which matches the recommended spec. We agree that it's the single most important thing in DJing.
One final thing: one of the benefits of DJ-1800 using QuickTime is that it allows you to play iTunes Music Store files right in DJ-1800, something which Traktor can't do.
Thanks for taking the time to give the feedback - I'd also agree that people should try all the tools out there, and see what works for them :-)
Dave.