Existing users, 
Advanced Search
 BitTorrent - 4.27.2torrent download client |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
Won't even run 
- Version: 4.27.2, 2/8/2008 12:00AM PST
Paul.Hunt
Launches. Within a minute it quits unexpectedly. This happens before I even try to do anything! Does this every time.
Retrograde ? - Version: 4.27.2, 8/31/2007 06:15AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
steve_good
I've just moved over to intel & 10.4 after a long ( and very stable ) time on 10.3.9.
Whilst I feel as if I've gone forward with the other applications, bit torrent seems to be a step back.
My major gripes are :
(1) the error messages - nothing else on OSX gives me error messages like this.
( just deal with it ! I don't want to babysit an application)
I hate these pop-up windows type messages.
(2) the inability to stop torrents once they reach a certain seed ratio
( for a lot of torrent sites, the seed ratio is important ).
(3) general stability / connectivity.
It seems to take longer than it used to to download a file.
To explain in simple terms : I used to just download a torrent file and let bit torrent take care of everything. Now it's like an annoying ginger step-child.
I mean, these are the people who developed the protocol, so how can they be so wrong ?
Whilst I feel as if I've gone forward with the other applications, bit torrent seems to be a step back.
My major gripes are :
(1) the error messages - nothing else on OSX gives me error messages like this.
( just deal with it ! I don't want to babysit an application)
I hate these pop-up windows type messages.
(2) the inability to stop torrents once they reach a certain seed ratio
( for a lot of torrent sites, the seed ratio is important ).
(3) general stability / connectivity.
It seems to take longer than it used to to download a file.
To explain in simple terms : I used to just download a torrent file and let bit torrent take care of everything. Now it's like an annoying ginger step-child.
I mean, these are the people who developed the protocol, so how can they be so wrong ?
Retrograde ? - Version: 4.27.2, 8/31/2007 06:15AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
steve_good
I've just moved over to intel & 10.4 after a long ( and very stable ) time on 10.3.9.
Whilst I feel as if I've gone forward with the other applications, bit torrent seems to be a step back.
My major gripes are :
(1) the error messages - nothing else on OSX gives me error messages like this.
( just deal with it ! I don't want to babysit an application)
I hate these pop-up windows type messages.
(2) the inability to stop torrents once they reach a certain seed ratio
( for a lot of torrent sites, the seed ratio is important ).
(3) general stability / connectivity.
It seems to take longer than it used to to download a file.
To explain in simple terms : I used to just download a torrent file and let bit torrent take care of everything. Now it's like an annoying ginger step-child.
I mean, these are the people who developed the protocol, so how can they be so wrong ?
Whilst I feel as if I've gone forward with the other applications, bit torrent seems to be a step back.
My major gripes are :
(1) the error messages - nothing else on OSX gives me error messages like this.
( just deal with it ! I don't want to babysit an application)
I hate these pop-up windows type messages.
(2) the inability to stop torrents once they reach a certain seed ratio
( for a lot of torrent sites, the seed ratio is important ).
(3) general stability / connectivity.
It seems to take longer than it used to to download a file.
To explain in simple terms : I used to just download a torrent file and let bit torrent take care of everything. Now it's like an annoying ginger step-child.
I mean, these are the people who developed the protocol, so how can they be so wrong ?
