Virex X (.Mac edition) - 7.5.1virus protection (for .Mac subscribers only) |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
Problem solved the easist and safest way...... - Version: 7.5, 11/22/2004 12:42AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
polymathic
Amazing but true:
FEATURES EXCLUDED FROM THIS RELEASE
Scan Contents of Mailboxes -- This Preferences feature of Virex 7.5.0 has been removed from Virex 7.5.1. This product is not meant to be utilized for scanning mails and mailboxes.
FEATURES EXCLUDED FROM THIS RELEASE
Scan Contents of Mailboxes -- This Preferences feature of Virex 7.5.0 has been removed from Virex 7.5.1. This product is not meant to be utilized for scanning mails and mailboxes.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- Problem solved the easist and safest way......
You try it! - Version: 7.5, 11/21/2004 12:27AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
RichB2u--2008
I downloaded the 25 MB installer for the new 7.5.1 version but since 7.2 is working fine I'll also wait for the brave souls out there...
Virex 7.5.1 is Posted on .Mac - Version: 7.5, 11/20/2004 12:56AM PST
Bob K1
Virex 7.5.1 is now posted on the .Mac web site.
Who wants to be the guinea pig & report back here?
Who wants to be the guinea pig & report back here?
the usefulness of this program Boggles me 



- Version: 7.2.1, 11/13/2004 05:24AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
KKrazyKen
Summary report on /Users/Kenny/*
File(s)
Total files: ........... 18922
Clean: ................. 18917
Not scanned: ........... 2
Possibly Infected: ..... 2
Non-critical Error(s): 1
Diagnose Scan completed at 2004-11-13 05:40:31 -0700
anyone want to scroll through 19k lines of text to tell me what files I need to check? Now where was that uninstaller...
File(s)
Total files: ........... 18922
Clean: ................. 18917
Not scanned: ........... 2
Possibly Infected: ..... 2
Non-critical Error(s): 1
Diagnose Scan completed at 2004-11-13 05:40:31 -0700
anyone want to scroll through 19k lines of text to tell me what files I need to check? Now where was that uninstaller...
Virex 7.5.1rc on Mcafee's website 



- Version: 7.5, 10/29/2004 09:06AM PST
th1nkd1fferent
Seems like there's a new version of Virex released by mcafee ppl.
It says it has fixed the mailbox deletion problem - how true is that?
It says it has fixed the mailbox deletion problem - how true is that?
Virex is no more 



- Version: 7.5, 10/5/2004 04:55AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
shaunrosenberg
I used this prooduct on my machines for @6months before I realized all the processor power they were eating up. Run activity monitor if you wanna see it in action. Not once did it locate a virus.This program has been deleted off all my machines and I will not reccomend it to anyone. There are much more efficient ways to deal with possible viruses/. This company seems not to offer any support to people with macs. See you virex...eehum..goodbye.
Dump Virex - Version: 7.5, 8/30/2004 02:46PM PST
(4 of 4 users found this comment useful)
John Sawyer
Let's see. Virex now, and in the past, has been doing all these things:
--Causes the Mac to crash
--Deletes crucial files
--Prevents other apps from running properly, not just crashing
--Prevents other apps from being installed
--Eats tons of processor time, sometimes the majority of it
--Etc
This is a classic list of problems CAUSED by many viruses. Virex has probably caused far more problems for Mac users than it has ever prevented or solved--you have to take the Occam's Razor view here. And since OS X has no real viruses yet, all that Virex is doing for Mac users (when it manages to work) is to detect Windows viruses in their email, which don't affect the Mac, and so it's just preventing them from being forwarded to Windows users. What do users of Virex get for all this-- the "feel-good" sensation of "doing something for the Windows community"? That's not our job, at least not at the price of all this trouble. Besides, the amount of "good" that Mac users do for Windows users, in stemming the comparatively tiny tide of Windows virus-infected email sent to Mac users, is so tiny as to be insignificant.
Some people will respond, "I use Virex and I've never had these problems". Well, you're lucky. And by supporting Virex, you're supporting its use by other people who WILL have these problems, so in effect you're paying a developer of a product whose behavior is identical to many viruses. Would you pay a virus author to keep him in the virus writing business?
It has the feel of a company trying deliberately to blow it on the Mac, so they can say to their shareholders or whoever makes their decisions, "Look at all the trouble caused by trying to program for the Mac OS! We should drop Mac support and just do Windows." I've seen this pattern several times over the years. Maybe they get a big tax writeoff for dropping a subdivision, or some other corporate nonsense. Virex is McAfee's only Mac product, as far as I know; they make their money from antivirus utilities on Windows and other platforms. Virex has been kicked around between about a half-dozen owners since it was first released--none of them seem to want it. If that's how they feel, or they can't hire competent programmers, and neither they nor Apple provide any real tech support for it, why bother with it?
As ilash reports below, McAfee no longer provides tech support for Virex (imagine--no tech support for their own product). In the past with other programs from other companies, this has often meant the program was in the process of being turned over to another company, so McAfee may be trying to turn over Virex to Apple, who may eventually provide tech support for it, and in the transition, the Virex programming team might not have decided to be very careful--after all, it may soon be Apple's headache--or the Virex programming team may already have been slashed by McAfee.
Maybe they'll get it together some day. The new features list for version 7.5 seems to imply they want to remain a viable product, but their actual performance makes it a weird paradox. I think most people should stop using Virex, and the few people who still want to use it can serve as the soldiers who get the first arrows in the back, and they'll continue to report their experiences so everyone else can decide whether to start using it again. If OS X viruses do start appearing in any significant number, maybe Virex will prove to be useful in the future, as long as its publisher, whoever that turns out to be, fixes the problems and doesn't go back to sleeping at the wheel.
--Causes the Mac to crash
--Deletes crucial files
--Prevents other apps from running properly, not just crashing
--Prevents other apps from being installed
--Eats tons of processor time, sometimes the majority of it
--Etc
This is a classic list of problems CAUSED by many viruses. Virex has probably caused far more problems for Mac users than it has ever prevented or solved--you have to take the Occam's Razor view here. And since OS X has no real viruses yet, all that Virex is doing for Mac users (when it manages to work) is to detect Windows viruses in their email, which don't affect the Mac, and so it's just preventing them from being forwarded to Windows users. What do users of Virex get for all this-- the "feel-good" sensation of "doing something for the Windows community"? That's not our job, at least not at the price of all this trouble. Besides, the amount of "good" that Mac users do for Windows users, in stemming the comparatively tiny tide of Windows virus-infected email sent to Mac users, is so tiny as to be insignificant.
Some people will respond, "I use Virex and I've never had these problems". Well, you're lucky. And by supporting Virex, you're supporting its use by other people who WILL have these problems, so in effect you're paying a developer of a product whose behavior is identical to many viruses. Would you pay a virus author to keep him in the virus writing business?
It has the feel of a company trying deliberately to blow it on the Mac, so they can say to their shareholders or whoever makes their decisions, "Look at all the trouble caused by trying to program for the Mac OS! We should drop Mac support and just do Windows." I've seen this pattern several times over the years. Maybe they get a big tax writeoff for dropping a subdivision, or some other corporate nonsense. Virex is McAfee's only Mac product, as far as I know; they make their money from antivirus utilities on Windows and other platforms. Virex has been kicked around between about a half-dozen owners since it was first released--none of them seem to want it. If that's how they feel, or they can't hire competent programmers, and neither they nor Apple provide any real tech support for it, why bother with it?
As ilash reports below, McAfee no longer provides tech support for Virex (imagine--no tech support for their own product). In the past with other programs from other companies, this has often meant the program was in the process of being turned over to another company, so McAfee may be trying to turn over Virex to Apple, who may eventually provide tech support for it, and in the transition, the Virex programming team might not have decided to be very careful--after all, it may soon be Apple's headache--or the Virex programming team may already have been slashed by McAfee.
Maybe they'll get it together some day. The new features list for version 7.5 seems to imply they want to remain a viable product, but their actual performance makes it a weird paradox. I think most people should stop using Virex, and the few people who still want to use it can serve as the soldiers who get the first arrows in the back, and they'll continue to report their experiences so everyone else can decide whether to start using it again. If OS X viruses do start appearing in any significant number, maybe Virex will prove to be useful in the future, as long as its publisher, whoever that turns out to be, fixes the problems and doesn't go back to sleeping at the wheel.
7.5 no longer available - Version: 7.5, 8/30/2004 02:21PM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
John Sawyer
Well, the short answer is that it's no longer available--due to all the problems it's caused, McAfee and Apple have withdrawn version 7.5, and have made 7.2.1 the currently available version.
Where is it? - Version: 7.5, 8/28/2004 03:04PM PST
danacameron_dotmac
I've tried repeatedly to download this mysterious Virex 7.5 but continue to get lost in the ridiculous McAfee maze of a website. And the .Mac website gives me the run-around too. Where is this download available?
Has an .ftp site that appears to work more consistently than the default server setting.