EnzymeX - 3.1DNA editor for molecular biologists |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
Anybody who gives… 



- Version: 1.1, 4/23/2003 12:48AM PST
LaskoVortex
this program less than 5 stars has personal issues. This is a one of a kind honey. SilverFish and michael b are dead on. I propose fasta input + digestion of "Available Enzymes". Also, needs Promega and Gibco/Invitrogen buffer systems in the tabs.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- *eyeroll*
Great program, but… 



- Version: 1.1, 2/20/2003 02:29PM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
HappyPig
the molecular weights given for the amino acids are each short the weight of water, i.e. their mass is calculated as if each amino acid was in a dehydrated form in a protein, not as the program's chemical structures show, which are in its normal, unpolymerized form.
Firstly, I cannot trust the recommended buffer combinations! For example, BamHI is listed in NEB 1, 2, 3 and 4 as 75%, 100%, 50% and 75% respectively. From the NEB website, activity is actually 75%, 100%, 100% and 100%.
Secondly, ORFs and restriction sites that span across the origin of circular vectors are not identified!
Unfortunately, while EnzymeX appears to function as expected otherwise, these two semi-major bugs makes me wary about relying too heavily on this program. From the authors' reply, it appears it is no longer in development. "Unfortunately Papers takes up most of our time these days, so it could take a while before this feature would appear." This is a pity, as these bugs should not be too difficult to fix.