iHook - 1.2Aqua front-end for command line executables |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
It's ALIVE! 



- Version: 1.0.3, 2/27/2006 02:30PM PST
Hal Itosis
This baby is really cool. I'm surprised it's not more popular/well-known.
Anyone who writes shell scripts (which might benefit from a GUI) should
definitely give iHook a serious look.
Powerful fun.
-HI-
Anyone who writes shell scripts (which might benefit from a GUI) should
definitely give iHook a serious look.
Powerful fun.
-HI-
works well... 



- Version: 1.0.1, 6/1/2004 06:16AM PST
ende
...as frontend in our radmind (same developers) deployment setup. on logout the clients sync the whole file-hierarchy to the server and ihook gives visual feedback (including a progress-bar) to the users without giving them a possibility to interact (not even ok-, close- or cancel-buttons). ihook is just right for that purpose.
if you want the possibility to interact try pashua. it gives you the possibility to interact via radio-buttons, checklists, textfields, browsewindows...
if you just want to display text, try pipealert.
if you want the possibility to interact try pashua. it gives you the possibility to interact via radio-buttons, checklists, textfields, browsewindows...
if you just want to display text, try pipealert.
Only thing is that the icon creeped a few people out, so I changed it to something generic. I also used Dockless on it, so help prevent people cancelling actions by force quitting iHook, and to make it look more integrated into the system.